The speaker asserts that the student who has been admitted to a university but who has no ability to afford the tuition, should get a free from governments. In my point of view, I am in favor of this policy, which can be substantiated by the following discussions.
开头写得很简单，这样好吗?
The first argument that can be presented to develop my position is that governments have obligation to provide education to every children. A good example may be found in the case that George Bush, preceding president of United State, had said :" The Federal role in education is to serve the children and make sure Federal dollars are well spent. To do this effectively, No Child Left Behind(NCLB) ensures that states receiving Federal funds set high standards and hold schools accountable for results, governments must encourage and reward success for children." In America, universities and state governments offer much financial aid for students, paying their education expenses, including tuition and fees, room and board, books and supplies, etc. However, the finical aid offered by Chinese universities is limited, few poor students can apply it. For this matter, many starving students can not afford the fees. It is necessary for our governments to investigate much money on education instead of spend much money on some unnecessary projects, such as constructing new building or officers' consumption on luxury, providing fees for students who can not afford it is governments' obligation.
In addition, there is another reason for me to choose this statement. The reason is that investigate on education is much worthier than many other fields. To illustrate, let us consider that a poor student spend ten years to get the acceptance of famous university, if she is refused by university just because have no ability to afford fees, resulting in her life become unpromising. However, if her free can be paid by governments, she will create much worth to society than such free. Beyond this policy, Many poor students like her can make their dream come true, contributing to our society greatly. In this view, providing free for poor students is a win-win way.
Admittedly, it may be true that some poor students take the free from governments for granted, enjoying the comfortable life instead of working hard on study, westing time and money in university. Actually, governments can make a rule that after these students find a good job should pay back these money to governments. The rule can encourage students work harder than before because they can not employed by any company if they do not have ability.
In summary, due to the aforementioned reasons, we may safely come to the conclusion that students who has been admitted to a university but can not afford it should get the free offered by governments, helping them to finish their education in university.  


刚开始写issue，想问您两个问题：（1）您感觉我issue整个文章逻辑是不是过于简单，这篇文章就是三段论那种，前两个支持，后一个让步反对一下，您认为这样简单的文章逻辑可以用在issue中吗？三个自然段是不是有点少呢？（2）issue是不是需要很深刻的例子，我在写作时想到的都是生活中比较简单的例子，是不是放在issue中不合适？
希望您给予指导，谢谢！