GRE 作文题目
来源于朗播用户：刘旸
[Claim] We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own. [Reason] Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning. [Specific Task Instruction: Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.]
题目分析
翻译
[观点]相对于所持观点和我们矛盾的人，我们通常能从和我们持相同观点的人那里学到更多。
[理由]意见不合会产生压力并阻碍学习。
[说明]写一篇文章，讨论你同意或反对这个观点，以及支持观点的理由达到怎样的程度。
指导
本题改编自老GRE的ISSUE1"We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own; disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning"。题目讨论我们从观点相同或不同的人那里学习效果的不同。对于比较类分析，首先要承认的是两者各有优缺点，不过重点要探讨的是相比之下哪个优点或者缺点更多。在分析的时候需要注意"we"和"people"之间的联系应当只有views，而并不被其他关系影响（例如，亲友、团队、上下级等）。同时，也可以根据不同情况去进行分类。分析过程中要突出：learn（这是大多数习作中会忽视的关键词）
写作思路 学会梳理作文思路--->上朗播网
1. 你平时认为有欠缺的观点的主要特征有什么呢？
回答：
对该领域不熟悉，或者对该领域过于自信，而片面的考虑
2. 请换位思考一下，平时你会怎样对待和你持有共同观点的人？对和你意见相矛盾的人的观点又会有怎样的对待呢？
回答：
会欣赏同观点的人，对于意见不同的会想法儿说服
3. 当面对两种不同行为的时候，你认为采取何种应对办法是最有效果的？请列举出你认为对这两种情况处理比较好的方法。
回答：
对照两种不同观点，找出可以互补的对方，学着从对立观点中激发灵感
4. 经过了对方或支持或反对，我们的观点会朝什么方向发展？观点的哪些地方会出现何种程度的进步或后退？
回答：
朝着正确的方向发展，支持则坚定了自己的信念，反对那么再研究讨论，看看究竟是怎样的
5. 如果和对方意见不合，你会有什么样的心理感受？进而会表现出什么样的行为？
回答：
如果是学术上的，那么就会争论，看看究竟谁对谁错，互相吸取看法，没什么大不了了，如果是生活上的，比如对待事物，境况处理方法的意见偏差很大，那么我就会对其有一定的疏远，因为我不能要求别人做什么，自己也没必要改变自己
其他用户的回答
作文
Do we learn from people whose views we share more than from those whose ideas contradict ours?The speaker claims so,for
the reason that disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.I concede that undue discord can impede learning and so we learn more from people whose ideas we share.Otherwise,in my view,whether some mutually share ideas can make people learn more from each other is quite a personal matter.
Admittedly,disagreement can cause stress and sometimes inhibit our learning,and as a result we might learn from people whose views we share than from those whose view contradict our own.For example, a student of paleontology learns little about the evolutions of an animal species under current study with an individual whose religious belief system precludes the possibility of evolution to begin with.And,economics and finance students learn little about the dynamics of a laissez-farie system by debating with a socialist whose view is that a centralized power should control all economic activity.Anyhow,people are at least easier to understand each other when they find them sharing the same ground in most cases.
However,disagreement can also benefit us greatly.On the one hand,distinct perspectives on an issue may turn out to sharpen our mind,broaden our ken and shed some light on the issue in question,and therefore enhance our learning.Contradictive opinions always serve to sharply reveal some flaws in our opinion or theory.In contrast,those who accede to your opinion are always inclined to neglect even cover up the shortcomings existing in your view.An obvious example is the debate since the opponents can easily find the flaws and weakness in our argument.Consequently,a heated debate usually leads to a thorough and comprehensive understanding about the subject in discussion.
On the other hand,throughout the human intellectual history,it is always the different schools of thought rather than those who share,on any issue,identical ideas with each other that combine to boost scientific and technological progress.For instance,the debate on the statistical interpretation of wave functions between the Copenhagen School，including Niles Bohr,Werner Heisenberg,Wolfgang Pauli and Max Born,and opponents ,including Albert Einstein and Erwin Shrodinger,results in a thorough and comprehensive understanding of quantum mechanics.
All in all,which one,disagreement or agreement,will promote our learning from others is quite a personal matter which depends on so many factors as age,motivations,psychological maturity,personal understanding with each other and so on.
In sum,disagreement with others may be counterproductive to learning under some circumstances while impetus sometimes.Whether disagreement or agreement facilitates our learning is quite a personal matter which depends on many intelligent and emotional factors.
Admittedly,disagreement can cause stress and sometimes inhibit our learning,and as a result we might learn from people whose views we share than from those whose view contradict our own.For example, a student of paleontology learns little about the evolutions of an animal species under current study with an individual whose religious belief system precludes the possibility of evolution to begin with.And,economics and finance students learn little about the dynamics of a laissez-farie system by debating with a socialist whose view is that a centralized power should control all economic activity.Anyhow,people are at least easier to understand each other when they find them sharing the same ground in most cases.
However,disagreement can also benefit us greatly.On the one hand,distinct perspectives on an issue may turn out to sharpen our mind,broaden our ken and shed some light on the issue in question,and therefore enhance our learning.Contradictive opinions always serve to sharply reveal some flaws in our opinion or theory.In contrast,those who accede to your opinion are always inclined to neglect even cover up the shortcomings existing in your view.An obvious example is the debate since the opponents can easily find the flaws and weakness in our argument.Consequently,a heated debate usually leads to a thorough and comprehensive understanding about the subject in discussion.
On the other hand,throughout the human intellectual history,it is always the different schools of thought rather than those who share,on any issue,identical ideas with each other that combine to boost scientific and technological progress.For instance,the debate on the statistical interpretation of wave functions between the Copenhagen School，including Niles Bohr,Werner Heisenberg,Wolfgang Pauli and Max Born,and opponents ,including Albert Einstein and Erwin Shrodinger,results in a thorough and comprehensive understanding of quantum mechanics.
All in all,which one,disagreement or agreement,will promote our learning from others is quite a personal matter which depends on so many factors as age,motivations,psychological maturity,personal understanding with each other and so on.
In sum,disagreement with others may be counterproductive to learning under some circumstances while impetus sometimes.Whether disagreement or agreement facilitates our learning is quite a personal matter which depends on many intelligent and emotional factors.
举一反三如何书写地道作文--->上朗播网
1.
Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field o...
2.
[Claim] Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's...
3.
Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field o...
4.
Requiring university students to take a variety of courses outside their major fields of study is th...
5.
Some people believe that universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outs...