Some people claim that a nation's government should preserve its wilderness areas in their natural state. Others argue that these areas should be developed for potential economic gain. [Specific Task Instruction: Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.]
翻译
一些人认为,一个国家的政府应该保持公有荒地的原始状态。另一些人认为,应该为了经济利益来开发这些地区。[说明:写一篇文章,讨论哪一个观点更加接近你自己的观点,并解释你选择这个观点的理由。在展开和支持你的观点时,你需要处理上面提到的两个观点]
指导
本题改编自老GRE的ISSUE83"Government should preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural state, even though these areas are often extremely remote and thus accessible to only a few people"。题目讨论对政府公共荒地原始状态保持的问题。在分析的过程中,可以从政府职责本身要考虑的内容、荒地原始状态的保持满足了哪些政府职责、荒地对人们生活的正负面和直接间接影响等方面展开思考。
1. 请结合具体事例分析:哪些荒地因为政府没有进行有效保护,给人们带来了负面影响;有哪些原始荒地因为政府的开发而带来了更多的价值?
回答:
Westward Movement
Over-development of the Yellow River in China.
2. 对政府而言,处于原始状态的荒地存在哪些直接价值和潜在价值?可尝试从经济、科技、政治、军事、教育、文化等角度思考。
回答:
Nation park. - Economy
The lung of the earth.
Future people might know better to develop it.
Variety of species
3. 除了保持荒地原始状态之外,政府还可以利用荒地进行哪些活动?这些活动的直接价值和潜在利益有哪些?可尝试从经济、科技、政治、军事、教育、文化等角度思考。
回答:
Nation park.
4. 对于的荒地,应该如何平衡开发与保持原状态的利弊?请结合以上分析做判断。
回答:
Keep the balance.
For two situation: 1. the wilderness area is not very important in ecosystem.
5. 政府在保持荒地原始状态过程中的收益是否大于付出?
回答:
the income is valueless