In 2010, Congress in the U.S did not reach to an agreement for the national debts until the last day of July, neat to the  deadline. It left me a profound impression for I felt confused at that time, why they could not reach to point since the more time they wasted, the harsh global economic enviornment would be. Now, after one-study of the introduction to  political science, I find out how naive my thought was. Poltical events ususally involve many aspects such as economy, culture or foreign affairs, and people in different position also are not willing to compromise. usually，according to my observation,people play different role, whether welcome or showing hatenss is based on the degree to which the policy can bring them benesits.

 Policy makers,like the controllers of a ship, are able to determine the dirention of the country. They believe strongly in their policies since these represent the interst of his class or his behind door force. Most people are reluctant to acknowledge that but the modern politic is under the shadow of group interests. The year 2012 is another election year, and in May 6th, the outcome of  French president election came out, and followed by the final election in november in the U.S. During the process, people's reaction to the candidates' politcal claim vary from places to place. The poor people may welcome the plan of tax cut, while the rich may show indifference towards this.The radical people may support the migrant restriction, while those embracing liberism may see it as a democratic repression .

Also, aother interesting issue realted to this topic is the blind following. Those who support some kind of policies may hatre to test its correctness since the policy is come up by their cherished leader. As a Chinese, I read several memoirs about the creazy time of the 1960's. When the red guards sentenced one person, their referrence was not the Constitute but what the venerate Chairman Mao said. Every red guard at that time had a red book about the words and ariticle their great leader had said or wrote. As the strong proponents,however, they did not pay any attention to the unreasonable aspects of the great leader's theory of the Culture Revolution. Their blindness was a main cause of the tragidy since the foundation of this young republic.

Although, what I have discussed above cannot cover the whole possible conditions, exceptions do exit when people can change their positions by some eternal forces or people never change their minds even the policies are demonstrated invalid. However, Looking at the current worldwide political stage, the two conditions I mentions are the most common, whther in Asia or Euroupe or the cmplicated Middle East. The atititude of policy suppotters depends on the potencial interest it can bring, and among those embracing the policy delightfully, a large proportion of them are blind followers.