GRE 作文题目
来源于朗播用户：James.Li
Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. [Specific Task Instruction: Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.]
题目分析
翻译
教育机构有责任去阻止它们的学生选择那些不太可能会成功的领域去学习。[说明：写一篇文章，讨论你同意或反对这个主张达到什么程度。在展开和支持你的观点时，一定要处理那些最有说服力的理由和/或例子，它们可能被用来挑战你的观点]
指导
本题讨论选择专业的参考因素。可以考虑教育应当如何培养学生的问题，除了以后的工作以外，教育应当提供给学生什么样的价值观和理念。而且对于“成功”的定义也是需要仔细考虑的内容。在分析的过程中，可以从教育培养学生是为了满足哪些要求、价值观对学生的作用、为成功而选择专业的意义、二者之间的关系以及利弊的对比等方面展开思考。
写作思路 学会梳理作文思路--->上朗播网
1. 怎样评价学习某个专业是否可能成功或者不可能成功？应该参考哪些因素？请举例并简述。
回答：
1)有潜力成为日常生活随处可见的技术 2）前人研究成果有明显的可改进 eg.物联网
2. 如果没能形成正确的价值理念标准，而仅仅为了“成功”而选择专业，会有哪些潜在的问题和不足？请举例并简述。
回答：
1）兴趣不足，急流勇退 2）劳动力过分供给，失业 eg.本科学金融
3. 除了为以后的成功做准备以外，在大学阶段，学生应该锻炼哪些其他能力？怎样进行这些能力的锻炼？请举例并简述。
回答：
人际交流沟通能力→学生会、社团活动；批判性思考能力→比较阅读
4. 在毕业之后的工作和生活中，是否只有专业知识才是有用的？如果不是，还有哪些知识是有用的？为什么？请举例说明。
回答：
相关的学科（eg.学经济的人数学一定要好）；非课程内容也重要（各种能力）
5. 教育机构应该对学生的学习和发展起到怎样的引导作用？都应该如何去做？请分析并简述。
回答：
0
其他用户的回答
作文
Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
What we are discussing here is whether educational institutions should dissuade students from persuing the inquiry in which students are unlikely to succeed. I, in this discussion, tend to agree with the assertion made there.
For one thing, students who major in field of study in which they are unlikely to succeed might lose enthusiam when they face difficulties, because they know it is hard for them to perform well in the study. After losing enthusiam, these student will definitely cut down on the study time they intend to devote, thus are more likely to be obscure in this field, which end up with a vicious circle between poor performance and less enthuisam. If teachers in school disregard this situation, there will be a great loss for teacher and students in time and effort after several years. For example, a student who is definitely not good at solving math problems would be afraid to tackle physics problems and physics experienment. If teachers accord him with opportunity to work in labotary work, both teacher and the student will not benefit from it.
Moreoever, the goal of college education is to provide society with students who can perform their work well. As we all know, jobs in modern society are highly specialized, so students just need to focus on their advantages. This decision will magnify the advantage and allow students to finish work efficiently,which gurantee a desirable performance in work place. If students pay less time on their advantage, their shining point will become obscure, and they can not stand out as a consequence.
Admittedly, there are several pragmatic problems when applying this view. For one thing, young students are in their early stage of mental development,which means that educational institutions might not identify the advantage and disadvantage of every student although they are more experienced in such area
What we are discussing here is whether educational institutions should dissuade students from persuing the inquiry in which students are unlikely to succeed. I, in this discussion, tend to agree with the assertion made there.
For one thing, students who major in field of study in which they are unlikely to succeed might lose enthusiam when they face difficulties, because they know it is hard for them to perform well in the study. After losing enthusiam, these student will definitely cut down on the study time they intend to devote, thus are more likely to be obscure in this field, which end up with a vicious circle between poor performance and less enthuisam. If teachers in school disregard this situation, there will be a great loss for teacher and students in time and effort after several years. For example, a student who is definitely not good at solving math problems would be afraid to tackle physics problems and physics experienment. If teachers accord him with opportunity to work in labotary work, both teacher and the student will not benefit from it.
Moreoever, the goal of college education is to provide society with students who can perform their work well. As we all know, jobs in modern society are highly specialized, so students just need to focus on their advantages. This decision will magnify the advantage and allow students to finish work efficiently,which gurantee a desirable performance in work place. If students pay less time on their advantage, their shining point will become obscure, and they can not stand out as a consequence.
Admittedly, there are several pragmatic problems when applying this view. For one thing, young students are in their early stage of mental development,which means that educational institutions might not identify the advantage and disadvantage of every student although they are more experienced in such area
举一反三如何书写地道作文--->上朗播网
1.
【IBT机经-59】Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: For future career success, relating...
2.
【IBT机经-73】Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: The fast development of society tod...
3.
Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in...
4.
【IBT机经-1】Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: In order to succeed, you should be m...
5.
Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field o...