the speaker contend that because disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning, people usually learn much more from people whoes have the same standing or similar interest than frrom people views contradict; however, whether the different views are beneficial to our discussion depends on how could we confront the pressure which arises from the disagreement of discussion.
There is no doubt that we could get along with others whose views we share becuse we could have the hamounious atmosphere to discuss the same topic based on the simiar interest and standing, when we have the similar or even same standing, people always could make a agreement on the problem, even if it is a controversial question, could we get something when we share views, undoubtedly, when we share the same views on the question, we could communicate with each others in the harmonious atmosphere of discussion, and because of this, people could arrive at the same destination efficiently.However, few of us take the pains to study our estabished conviction, indeed, we always have the natural repugnance to doing so. After all, only if people would have shared views each other, their perspective would be consticted in some particular areas.
Furthermore, when people have the distinctive perspectives and standing, their always could go on thinking and exploring more information to sovle the controversy and to support their own ideas, because of this, the controversy could be discussed more deeply in multiple perspective and standing, for instant, there is a prominent creative research team in our university, the leader always ecourage members to express their different opinions on their academic subject during their seminar, but he also posits that when members have differnt ideas, their need to support their ideas by collecting more material and information on the same subject, what's the advantage of their seminar every week, from my perspective their could think and explore the same subject in different standing and views, by doing this, their perspective could be more multiple and deeply, so they could sovle the problem by thinking critically from the entire perspective.
In fact, human been could know the world by controversy and then arrive at the common destinaton, and the process of knowing the world is to express the different ideas and perspectives, and then find out the disparity and creativity , finally people could make a agreement on the same topic which were originally controversial, such as THe Copenhagen weather conference, the different countries have the distinctive perspective onthe decreasing the amount of emitting CO2 based on their own interest, by further discussion and conciliationm finally the countries could make a agreenment on dealing with the climate change.
TO sum up, admittedly, we could confront the pressure which arises from the different views on the same topic when people are attempting to explore the right anwser, when we make full use of the pressur to further explore unknown world, and finally when we arrive at the common destination, we could find out the problem could be discussed and explored more deeply and multiple perspective.