From the contention of speaker people put too much attention on the individual feat. As a matter of fact, the forgotten group’s contribution may promote the whole history or determine the trend. I fundamentally agree with the speaker, after all without others help or support a few of people can hardly propel the history forward.
  The groups of people whose identities have long been forgotten may mostly owning to their contribution is under the surface. Nevertheless, their effort provides the possibility for the latter significant history event. One apt illustration to this point involved in the first abroad student Rong,hong who strived for the chance to let children study abroad after he back to the country. Whereas, when people mention this period of history, “liumeiyoutong” is resound in people’s mind but not a name of Rong, hong who lead the children come to American. Without Rong,hong’s effort, China would lose a group of elite whose contribution affect the whole country in the latter time. Another forgotten people are point to the populace. Their effort and contribution create the history. They are the people who accomplish the history task with hand and life defending their territory and ideal. Without populace identify, every contention of the famous few is just a words, let alone the attempt to change the society.
  The famous few on the other hand affect the whole history events. Their notion and behavior create the history. Without these people the history will be rewrite. The forgotten group's effort will eliminate. Without the Martin Luther King associate the whole black people, the government would not be abandon the discrimination rule and policy. Without Deng Xiao Ping Hong Kong would not back to China. Even the forgotten group may influence the famous few, but in the end it's the famous few who determine the history trend and who lead the history.
  The speaker is failed to see the relationship between the two groups of people. Emphasizing any group will lead to deviate the correct road. We cannot deny the contribution from the famous few, at the same time we should realize the effort of forgotten people. Without both people's effort the history will not happen. Treating the history with an objective view, one person cannot own the strength to create a history alone. For that matter we should strike a balance in judging those people.
  In the final analyze, people should avoid appraising a history people exaggeratedly base on the records. We should put our sight in a higher position, not to be distorted by the passive record and other people's judgment. No one can deny the famous people's contribution, but not everyone can see the forgotten people's effort. The critical thing we should do is to hold the relationship between the famous few and forgotten people