Therer a assailable issus that should teacher's salaries besed on their students' academic performance?  Many people including the author back this idea, for they consider that if students' academis perfaormance decides teachers' salaries, then teacher would devote themselves to education, which would prompt their students' academic performance. And therefore, a nation would develop better.  Nevertheless, I couldn't agreeble accept that kind of theory, for the author omits many accounts. In my viewpoint, once teachers' salary is up to their students' academic performance, teachers would assign students abundent assignments in order to upheval their students' academic performance, that is, making a boost of their salary.
Why we need teachers? Is it we need teacehrs just  to obtain knowledge? I don't think so, because we also can gain knowledge through self-study.Therefore, the reason why we need teachers is obvious that we demand other qualities that we can learn form teachers, as well as, our confusions nees to be settled. A excellent teacher should teache students various aspects of knowledge, guide students decelops in a certain direction, and help us get rid of troubles. For instance, teachers should transmit their passion, their optimistic attitude to us and lead us set up a value personality.  Besides, two phenomenon would exist that some excellent educat those students who abhore study and their academic performance are unsatisfible. On the contrary, some irresponsible teachers incidently educate students who is thirsty for knowledge, which is unfair to those excellent teacehrs. As a result, only relying on the academic performance of students to pay teachers is unsound.
Taking accounts of students' conditions, students' assignment might be intered in assignments since this issue was operated; because teachers demand more salary. Additonally, in order to finish their homework, students couldn't spend time in their interest or exercise, which would deteriorate students' health. What's more, teachers might remiss the education of pjersonality, which could occurr this phenomenon that all of students performed well in academic while their pjersonalities are abhored. Perhapes, they would break the harmony of the society. Besides, teachers would arrange everything for students, for which could spare their students more time to put into study.The result of that plan would make students turn to robots that only operating the orders commanded by teachers but independent thinking, which is bad for the development of their students' carrers.
 Desipite those two individual aspects, it could deteriorate the ability of a nation. Because all of its students have to learn that obsalecent knowledge under the pressure of their teachers, the majority of students couldn't develop their interests; what's worst, in the progress of obtaining knowledge, students, more or less, would be limited in thoughts, that is, their critical thinking would be affected, which is paramount to futhur research. Compared to those students who could develop their hobby, this kind of education might be keep weighty contribution away.
In a nutshell, only resting on students' academic performance to determine the wages of teacehs is unwitted. However, in my opinion, even the author's reason is unsound, it does brain storm a reasonable approach that schoole should besed on some major asperts, such as education, the amount of homework, the attitude of teacher towards live, and the personality of teacher to judge teachers' salary.In this way, students could develop more reasonable.
Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.