GRE 作文题目
来源于朗播用户：韩煦
In order to improve the quality of instruction at the college and university level, all faculty should be required to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.
题目分析
翻译
为了提高大学的教学质量，所有老师都必须花时间来研究一些与自己所授课程相关的非学术问题。
指导
教师研究与所授课程相关的学术问题是必须的，而本题需要阐述的是与课程相关的非学术问题与教学质量之间的关系，你要分析的是为什么这些非学术问题会与教学质量相关。注意，你不能只罗列出老师需要研究哪些非学术问题，而要阐述研究这些问题对教学的作用。
写作思路 学会梳理作文思路--->上朗播网
1. 描述一个你认为优秀的大学教师，他/她在教学过程中除了体现学术方面的高水平外，还体现出了什么非学术的能力？
回答：
有的老师个人魅力很高，也许是因为他的知识面非常广，同学们听他的课的时候都会收获到书本内容之外的知识。
2. 对于教师来说，哪些问题是与所授课程相关的非学术问题？这些问题会对教学起到什么作用？请举例说明。
回答：
如教授语文的老师，多多阅读各类历史文学书籍就是与其课程相关的非学术问题。它可以提高老师的文学积淀，对授课时对于某些问题的讲解也有帮助。
3. 教师的哪些素质会影响到大学的教学质量？这些素质哪些是学术方面的，哪些是非学术方面的？请举例说明。
回答：
学术水平、知识面、师德师品、工作态度等。前两项是学术方面的，后两项非学术。
4. 教师花时间来研究与课程相关的非学术问题有什么好处？有什么弊端？请举例说明。
回答：
好处在于一定程度上有助于教师对自己学科进一步的理解和研究，弊端在于占用一定时间可能影响本职工作或个人休息。
其他用户的回答
作文
From the ancient times till now, teachers are regarded as respected persons in society. Nowadays, faculty in college are asked to spend time working outside the academic world in profession relevant to the courses they teach, which I generally agree and find it possible to be discussed.
First it is necessary for the instructors to jump out of the academic world that they're familiar with.We may just take a male teacher of literature for example. If he takes part in some history or culture conferences, he may discuss with the historians and scholars to know more background details of writers, which will finally be beneficial to his college teaching. Since he could tell more historical stories or anecdotes to his students, his courses are surely turning funny and charming so that more and more students may find it interesting to learn literature.So it is with other certain subjects. If teachers are willing to introduce knowledge from other fields, they can make it more easily for their students to accept and understand what they say.
Second, there will be many negative effects if the faculty do not contact with other fields. The most obvious one is the risk of losing the attention of students and society. One instructor who narrowly concentrates on his or her own academic world will be deserted by society someday. And students will not be attracted to attend a rigid professor's courses. Like a philosophy professor who never read newspaper or talk about current affairs, his thoughts will be likely to remain just in his own realm of ideology and his philosophy will never restrict and direct people's behavior or do good to social development.
However, merely asking all faculty to spend time outside their academic world is not fair and reasonable. After all, each instructor has his own arrangement of teaching and researching, which should be the most suitable and rational for himself. Indiscrimination will occupy their time of own duty or leisure time, which may affect their work and life.
I accede the decision has both positive and negative effect on the quality of instruction at the college and university level,as I demonstrate before,and I tend to bolster that it is more beneficial than harmful in most cases that will help improve the education of university.
First it is necessary for the instructors to jump out of the academic world that they're familiar with.We may just take a male teacher of literature for example. If he takes part in some history or culture conferences, he may discuss with the historians and scholars to know more background details of writers, which will finally be beneficial to his college teaching. Since he could tell more historical stories or anecdotes to his students, his courses are surely turning funny and charming so that more and more students may find it interesting to learn literature.So it is with other certain subjects. If teachers are willing to introduce knowledge from other fields, they can make it more easily for their students to accept and understand what they say.
Second, there will be many negative effects if the faculty do not contact with other fields. The most obvious one is the risk of losing the attention of students and society. One instructor who narrowly concentrates on his or her own academic world will be deserted by society someday. And students will not be attracted to attend a rigid professor's courses. Like a philosophy professor who never read newspaper or talk about current affairs, his thoughts will be likely to remain just in his own realm of ideology and his philosophy will never restrict and direct people's behavior or do good to social development.
However, merely asking all faculty to spend time outside their academic world is not fair and reasonable. After all, each instructor has his own arrangement of teaching and researching, which should be the most suitable and rational for himself. Indiscrimination will occupy their time of own duty or leisure time, which may affect their work and life.
I accede the decision has both positive and negative effect on the quality of instruction at the college and university level,as I demonstrate before,and I tend to bolster that it is more beneficial than harmful in most cases that will help improve the education of university.
举一反三如何书写地道作文--->上朗播网
1.
Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students. [Specific ...
2.
Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field o...
3.
[Claim] Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's...
4.
Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field o...
5.
Requiring university students to take a variety of courses outside their major fields of study is th...