GRE 作文题目 来源于朗播用户:王惟
As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. [Specific Task Instruction: Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.]
题目分析
翻译
人们越来越多的依赖于靠科技解决问题,人类自我思考的能力一定会衰退。[说明:写一篇文章,讨论你同意或反对这个说法达到什么程度,并解释你选择这个观点的理由。在展开和支持你的观点时,你需要考虑这个说法可能在哪些方面成立或者不成立,并解释你所考虑的这些东西如何体现你的观点]
指导
本题为老GRE的ISSUE66原题。题目讨论科技对人类影响的话题,题目分为两部分:第一部分陈述了一个大家都接受的事实——“人们越来越多的依赖于靠科技解决问题”;第二部分以这个事实为基础,给出了“依赖于科技必然会降低人类自我思考能力”的判断。题目不难理解,相关事例也有很多,分析时应当注意以下两点: 1、论述中始终要与“人们的自我思考能力”以及“解决问题”相关联,无论是讨论科技的正面作用还是负面作用,都应当以“有利于自我思考”或“有碍于自我思考”为方向。 2、可以静止独立的去对比分析,同时也可以采用动态发展的眼光去分析,影响程度的变化以及新情况的出现都可能会对判断产生影响。
1. 人们在平时的生活、工作、学习的过程中,都面对哪些问题?解决这些问题的方法都有什么?请结合具体事例简述。
回答: 比如与人通信、联系、交流方面的问题,人们与周围的人交流,可以面对面的直接对话,然而如果与不在身边的人交流,人们就需要拥有更多更好的沟通方式。
2. 人们解决问题的方法在科技帮助下,在哪些方面得到了改进和突破?和原方法相比有了怎样的提高?效果如何?请结合具体事例简述。
回答: 在科技的帮助下,人们解决问题的方法变得更加多样化和便捷。比如与远方的人的交流联系方面,在电话出现以前,人们更多地是通过信件进行往来沟通,然而当电话出现以后,人们可以通过电话与不在身边的人进行交谈,但是费用往往较高,而且固定性比较强,不过灵活,不能满足人们随时随地联络的需求。而手机出现后,手机通话和短信使人与人之间交往变得更加便捷,且其成本更加低廉,但是往往只能传递信息,而没有面对面聊天的质感;当互联网普及,人们开始在网上选择语音和视频聊天,这个时候,人与人之间交流的需求获得了更大的满足。
3. 人类的自我思考的能力在什么场合或者情况下会被用到?要思考哪些问题?请结合具体事例简述。
回答: 在独自工作或独自作业的时候,比如说独自设计某样新产品的时候。他需要思考一些与该产品相关的零部件的选择,组装,该产品的工作原理所涉及到的一些科技原理,以及该产品的外观设计,人机关系等等
4. 科技能否代替思考能力?如果能,请举例;如果不能,为什么?
回答: 科技不能代替思考能力。因为在很多时候一个人的思考能力往往体现在一个人的创新思维上,科技之内能依据某向特定的功能和定理去完成某项作业,但一个人的思考能力很多时候会是创新的源泉,这是科技所无法取代的。
5. 有哪些原因会导致人类自我思考能力衰退?这些原因有哪些是科技造成的?思考能力的衰退与科技之间存在必然联系么?
回答: 当人们懒于去思考去发现去创新的时候。比如当人们不接受教育时候,人们的思考变少,导致人们的自我思考能力下降。其中,也许科技进步导致人们生活日益便捷,人们对生活的需求的思考也许会下降,但是思考能力的衰退与科技之间并不存在必然联系
其他用户的回答
作文
For the science and technology is developing continuously nowadays, it's more and more conveninent that human's life become. So in such a background like this, there are some terrified about the ascent of science and technology that the capability of human's thinking would be decreasing, what is mentioned by the author of the issue. But in my opinion, the development of science and technology can't distort the capability of human's thinking.
At first, we can observe from the historical fact that after each scientistic revolution in the history, we can't see that the human's thinking capability were be descent, conversly, usually more advanced after a huge revoluntion of science and techonology. For instance, after the first industry revoluntion in the end of the 19th centry, the whole world came into the "electrical era" continuously, and a lot of famous scientists like Einstain, Bell were upwelling. Obviously, from the phonomonia of the scientists upwelling we can see that the capability of human's critical thinking were never impared that time , adversly the development of science and technology can improve it by this way.
After discussing the fact in history, we can discuss from the essence of the human's thinking capability. It's a common saying that the capability of human' thinking depends on the frequency of a person's thinking. Human's all have a telent to thinking. If a person is adept to solve the problems in life by thinking, that is to say, using his/her brain for more times, the capability of thinking can be improved. But the capability of human's thinking is not depended on the development of science and technology actually.
However, it's not absolutely meaningless that some people think that thedevelopment of sience and technology can abstain the human's thinking capability, the reasons may be like as follows that a high-developed science and technology tends to make our life become more and more convenient and the demand of a better and more convenient mean to solve problems become less and less, so thinking tends to unnecessary, so the capability of human's thinking would be imparied. But I think this face of the problem affect few om people's thinking ability, that if people keep their brain active, the capability of  thinking would not be descent.
Let us see that wether the thinking capability would be improved if the science and technology had never be developed. In acent world when the level of science and technology is low, the thinking capability of human is also low that they have never see so many kinds of new things by advanced science and technology. So the status conditions of technical level cannot help human's thinking capability become improved. Instead, a developing science and technology level can keep the advance and active or human's thinking region so that keep the ability of human's thinking.
In conclusion,although some people think that the develoing science and technology would abstain the capability of human's thinking for it would reduce human's thinking times or region, but my statement insist on that the developing of science and technology cannot affect the human's thinking capability, it's only depends on yourself.
写作指导
写作指导启发思路,积累素材,有效解决写作没思路、没素材的问题。
观看名师讲解,边看边学!
轻松扫一扫,有趣又有料
10G 托福视频教程分享群
374897650
10G GRE 视频教程分享群
305634398

请选择发起聊天的方式:

安装 QQ