GRE 作文题目 来源于朗播用户:大眼睛大叔
All parents should be required to volunteer time to their children's schools. [Specific Task Instruction: Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.]
题目分析
翻译
应该要求所有父母都拿出时间给他们的孩子所在的学校。[说明:写一篇文章,讨论你同意或反对这个建议达到什么程度,并解释你选择这个观点的理由。在展开和支持你的观点时,你要描述在具体的环境中,采纳这个建议可能会有什么好处,或不会有什么好处,并解释这些例子如何体现了你的观点]
指导
本次改编自老GRE的ISSUE154"Both parents and communities must be involved in the local schools. Education is too important to leave solely to a group of professional educators"。题目讨论教育参与者范围的问题。在分析的过程中,可以从:父母、专业的教育人员在教育过程中分别的优势和不足、教育对二者的需要以及等父母参与到学校教育之后的理由等方面展开思考。
1. 请列举几个国家或学校的教育情况,对比分析这些教育中,家长的参与情况以及学生整体表现情况。
回答: 中国家长很重视孩子的教育,一般不会参与学校的教育工作而是在假期给孩子报各种辅导班,本质上来讲他们并没有实质性的参加对孩子的教育工作。美国家长往往比较注重与学校配合来教育孩子,但他们主要是在社会活动兴趣爱好上参与,在学业上也很少参与。这两种教育情况各有利弊。中式教育的确对孩子的学业提高有很大帮助,而美国教育更注重培养活泼开朗的个人。
2. 父母可以通过哪些形式参与到学校教育中?请举例并简述。
回答: 通过积极参加学校组织的亲子互动活动,在兴趣爱好上正确的引导,辅导孩子的功课等。
3. 父母的参与对于教育有哪些帮助和意义?请举例并简述。
回答: 父母是孩子最好的老师。父母积极参与教育能与学校教育相配合,二者相辅相成,为孩子提供学业、人生上的双重教育。比如家长在家庭中可以培养孩子的责任感,爱心,好的生活习惯等。
4. 专业的教育者在进行教育的过程中有哪些优势和不足?请举例并简述。
回答: 优势:他们在学业上有着无可置疑的权威,能科学系统的传授知识。 不足:很难因材施教,在人格上对孩子的培养不足。 比如学生可以从学校学到学术知识,但很难学到为人处世。后者大多是要靠家庭的氛围去营造的。
5. 将教育仅交给专业的教育者是否存在不足?如果会,有哪些不足?如果不会,请说明理由。
回答: 不足:会使孩子在人生观价值观生活习惯为人处世上缺乏指导,也很难在心理上给予孩子正确的引导,另外难以根据孩子的自身特点进行教育。
其他用户的回答
作文

  The speaker asserts that all parents should be required to volunteer time to their children's schools. I fundamentally agree. In my point of view, I tend to hold that both parents and schools play vital role in the education of children. All parents should teach their children with schools together.
  Admittedly, teachers own much knowledge and experience on education. For that reason, schools have the ability to provide children more scientific and systemic education. For example, there are many teachers whose majors are different in schools. They are professional in their own field like physics, math, chemstry or literature. With the professional knowledge, they can teach children well. However, it is nearly impossible for parents to teach their children about some certain course. So schools are irreplacable in academic education.
  However, schools are not perfect in educating children. The teaching system of schools also have deficiencies. As we all know, every kid has his or her own personalities. Cause there are much more children than teachers, schools are not likely to educate and guide every of them acording to his or her character. For example, children usually meet unhappy things in their life like failing in exams, losing in a game, quarreling with other children and so on. When those happen, teachers have to face the difficulties to give every child right guidance in psychologically.
  Finally, parents can teach and guide their children in disparate ways. According to a sociological research, families can influence children more than schools in emotion, charater, intellect and recoginization.  The parents have the responsibility to creat a good atmosphere for their children in order to make them grow happily and healthily. For example, in the <Growing Pains>, Mr. Seaver is a lovely father, he gives good guidances to his children and helps them deal with problems in their life. The image of Mr. Seaver is popular even now. He gives a good example to all parents.
 To sum up, I concede that schools play an essential role in educating children. But parents' participation in educating children is also necessary. Each of them is complementary to another. So I fundamentally agree with the speaker.

写作指导
写作指导启发思路,积累素材,有效解决写作没思路、没素材的问题。
观看名师讲解,边看边学!
轻松扫一扫,有趣又有料
10G 托福视频教程分享群
374897650
10G GRE 视频教程分享群
305634398

请选择发起聊天的方式:

安装 QQ