GRE 作文题目 来源于朗播用户:大眼睛大叔
People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it. [Specific Task Instruction: Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.]
题目分析
翻译
对某一种观点或政策最坚定的人也是对其最挑剔的人。[说明:写一篇文章,讨论你同意或反对这个说法达到什么程度,并解释你选择这个观点的理由。在展开和支持你的观点时,你需要考虑这个说法可能在哪些方面成立或者不成立,并解释你所考虑的这些东西如何体现你的观点]
指导
本题改编自老GRE的ISSUE146"People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are the most critical of it"。题目比较抽象,你可以从生活中的一些类似的事情来进行思考,比如父母对子女的挑剔,竞争对手的挑剔等。你可以考虑人们对于某种政策或观点坚定的原因,同时考虑对一种政策或观点挑剔的原因,从而建立它们之间的关联。
1. 描述一个经常被人们挑剔的观点或者政策,人们为什么会挑剔它?挑剔它的群体是拥护他的多还是反对他的多?
回答: 房价问题是人们经常挑剔的问题。无论房价如何总是会有人买不起房。开发商往往认为房价太低,而大部分百姓都认为国家应该控制房价。
2. 人们会出于哪些因素而对某个观点或政策坚定不移?这些因素哪些会造成这个人挑剔/不挑剔它?请举例说明。
回答: 绝大多数情况下,人们只关心某一政策是否对自身有利。如果对自身有利则会坚定不移。如果与自身利益无关但对大部分人有利时也会坚定不移。比如个人所得税,大部分人都是支持的。
3. 坚信某个观点或政策人会出于哪些因素来挑剔这个观点或政策?又会因为哪些因素不挑剔这个观点或政策?请分别举例说明。
回答: 比如这个观点或政策的可行性,利弊,是否完美等。如果这个观点或政策已经很大程度上的解决了问题只是细节上有些不同的做法时,一般不会挑剔。
4. 反对一个观点或政策人会出于哪些因素来挑剔这个观点或政策?又会因为哪些因素不挑剔这个观点或政策?请分别举例说明。
回答: 比如这一观点或政策危害了某人的切身利益。比如观点或政策对自身无影响。
5. 人的情绪会对人的判断和行为造成什么影响?请举例说明。
回答: 人的情绪不利于人的判断和行为。在情绪的影响下,人们无法做出客观的判断或行为。比如在愤怒的时候人们容易因为一时冲动而做傻事。
其他用户的回答
作文

  The speaker assterts that people who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it. I fundamentally agree. In my point of view, I concede that people who disagree with an idea or policy may be critical of it sometimes, however, under most circumstances, people who are most critical of it are the ones who are most deeply committed to it.
  Adimittedly, under some circumstances, people who disagree an idea or policy may be also ciritical of it. Their disagreement may just come from their critics to it. Because the idea or policy is harmful to them or conflicts with their thoughts. For example, when Copernicus established his theory that the center of the universe was the sun not the earth, almost all western people criticized him. The theory conflicted with people's belief in God and the thoughts that the center of the universe was the earth. The critics had lasted a long time until people were unfettered from the constraints of wrong thoughts.
  However, I'd like to say when people aren't critical of an idea or policy, they don't care it at the same time. Their uncritics result from their indifference to the idea or policy. In Beijing, China, the government has to limit the numeber of cars which belong to an citizen. Because the more and more private cars have led to many transportional problems. The policy faces different opinions in Beijing and other big cities. But  people living in small villages and towns don't have any opinions about it and even many of them don't know the policy. So people criticize an idea and policy when they are involved in it.
  Finally, people who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy may be the most critical of it. They just hope the idea or policy can be improved and become increasingly perfect. For example, the Set Theory is one of the fundaments of modern math now. But it was imperfect, when it was proposed at the beginning of 20th century. The imcomplete Set Theory even caused a challenge to the fundament of math in 1910s. On the other hand, to make it more complete and perfect, many mathicians devoted their whole life to improve it. During more than a century, the Set Theory has been approaching to a perfect theory. 
  To sum up, I concede that people who opposite an idea or policy may be critiacl of it sometimes. However, as I mentioned above, under most circumstances, people who are most critical of an idea and policy are the most deeply committed to it. So I fundamentally agree with the speaker.
 

写作指导
写作指导启发思路,积累素材,有效解决写作没思路、没素材的问题。
观看名师讲解,边看边学!
轻松扫一扫,有趣又有料
10G 托福视频教程分享群
374897650
10G GRE 视频教程分享群
305634398

请选择发起聊天的方式:

安装 QQ