I hold that inaccurate assumptions does not actually turn out to be wrong assumptions. Thus the statement that any piece of information is doubtful and should be mistrust might not be appropriate. In fact, we should first accept these plausible assumption before we can eventually prove or disprove them, and therefore we cannot mistrust assumptions until we can abandon it reasonablly.

We might not consider inaccurate assumptions as wrong assumptions, for these assumptions sometimes are deduced logically and capable of explaining several things: relativity theory does not displace classical mechanics since there are intrinsicly connected: in fact, some theory in classical mechanics is just a special case in relativity theory; we cannot mistrust all the idea of arranging chemical elements after the emergence of periodic table because both of them are based on a rational reason: to group elements by their chemical attributes. Thus it is doubtful to mistrust all assumptions that have proved to be inaccurate since they might be valuable to some extent.

If we mistrust any piece of information referred to as fact, we will make little progress since they might be the only basis we could depend on. There are many fields of study that require theories and research data made by previous people. For instance, to come up with astronomical theories, astronomer should integrate data that made by other people in history and observation collected by themselves, since it is unrealistic for any individual to collect data through a hundred and even thousand years. In addition, the law of conservation of energy, which is assumed to be true, cannot be proved despite of its worldwide use in science. Thus, sometimes we have no choice but to rely on previous assumptions.

Nor will we judge whether an assumption is accurate or not if we have chosen to mistrust it totally. Copernicus should first trust in geocentrism which enable him to find out the inaccuracy in that theory and thus come up with heliocentrism. Darwin, on the other hand, have to temporarily trust in the idea that god creates every creatures because it is the contradiction between his belief and the observation results he made that forces him to put forward Origin of Species to justify his own idea against common sense at that time. 

Therefore, to sum, simply mistrusting assumptions because of the possible inaccuracy in them does not suggest a responsible attitude. We should trust some assumptions partially because they are sometimes logical and even uncontroverted, because they might be the only basis we can depend on and because we will never know whether these assumptions are actually facts until we have made use of and evaluated it.