TOEFL 作文题目
来源于朗播用户：正能量来袭
How do movies or television influence people's behavior? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer.
题目分析
翻译
电影或电视节目如何影响人们的行为？给出理由和具体的例子支持你的观点。
指导
我们主要论述电影或电视节目影响人们生活的途径，而不是讨论它们到底有没有对人们造成影响或是造成了什么样的影响。比如，电视节目会更人性化，在人们晚上回家休息的时候放映精彩的节目吸引观众。
写作思路 学会梳理作文思路--->上朗播网
1. 你喜欢看电影或电视吗？描述一部你最喜欢的电影或是电视节目。
回答：
天使爱美丽 绚丽的画面，女主人公天马行空的想象 对爱情的执着 善良的内心
2. 你从电影或电视中学到了什么？
回答：
不被自己悲惨童年而打到的乐观精神，并且开展一些列助人为乐的行为。我学到抱着一种乐观的心态对待生活学习，凡是没有绝对，发现生活中的小乐趣
3. 这些学到的东西对你的行为有什么益处和弊端？
回答：
好处：积极向上，不怕困难，凡是都往好处想
坏处：自己善良误以为别人也是善良的，有时候有很受伤
4. 如果没有电影或是电视，人们的生活会有什么改变？
回答：
人们会少一些娱乐的设施，同样也会创造出别的娱乐设施
5. 电影或电视节目这种文化产品在人们的生活中起到什么作用？
回答：
娱乐节目给人们放松，有些交通路况的节目有助于人们的出行，有些益智类节目还可以帮助人们增长点知识。同时有些暴力色情的内容也会影响人们的生活。去模仿，。。。。
其他用户的回答
作文
The given argument brings out the conclusion that the company should resume production. To justify the conclusion, the author pointrf out that now that have a new fabric supplier. Further nire, he indicated that the costomers still be pent-up customwe demand.At the first glance, the argument seems to be some what logical, further and careful reflection would reveal this statement is groundless and omits amount of vital reason. As far as I concerned, this argument suffers from at least three logical flaws as follow.
Fristly, the author states that they have a new fabric supplier after five years to demonstrate his opinion.The author assumes that produce just need suppor.In this argument, however, there is no sound evidence to illustrate it. The argument fails to take into consider other possible reasons. For example, they should consider the require about market. People do not buy wool clothes if no one like it after five years that wool clothes become propular any more. Even if the wool clothes still propual in nowtoday market. We do not whether appear new marteril that more and more fashion and cheap than the company have. In this way, people are still not buy the wool clothes with a new marteils.In that situation, it seems the author cannot justifiably conclude that they should resume production. So, just as discussed above, in order to make the claim more forceful, the arguer should provide more information about the condiction of nowtody market and the matrily in today.
Secondly, the author employs the evidence that there will be pent-up customer demand since the complany's major competitor no longer makes an alpaca covercoat to prove his conclusion. The argument's conclusion depends on the assumption that now market and five years ago markets have shared same condision, but the author does not supply any evidence to confirm this assumption. It is quite possible other reasons. For example, the fashion tend is changed, people do not like wool clothes. Maybe in this cause, the major competitorn no longer produce wool clothes. Even if the market is still prpuary, but we do not know the price of a new materilas. If the price is so high, there are little people could ability to buy it, the complany can not have much profits.Without accounting for anf ruling out the trends of nowtaday market, the wool clothes' price and the buy ability of people, the author cannot bolster the argument.
Additionalyy, the author claims that the complany profits will increase to demonstrate his conclusion. The assumption made by the author to arrive at the conclusion is that the profits just relevent with require from market, but the author offers no evidence to substantiate this crucial assumption. It is just as possibility other reasons. For example, we do not know whether it is have require. Even though there has require, we do not know the expension of cost, transport and making. Even if the complany can have some profits depend on the wool clothes, it can not replevent all complany will increase profits. Maybe the wool clothes are opputy a little precent of the complany. The complany have other production with losing money. The author's reasoning is definitely flawed unless he can convince me that the require of market, the cost and precent of complany and other possible scenarios are unlikely.
To sum up, the author's argument mentioned above is based on several unconvincing evidence. In order to draw a better conclusion, the author should present us with more revelant explanatons, such as the require of market and the cost of complany to suppor his argument. Before more information procided, the argument should be considered prudently.
Fristly, the author states that they have a new fabric supplier after five years to demonstrate his opinion.The author assumes that produce just need suppor.In this argument, however, there is no sound evidence to illustrate it. The argument fails to take into consider other possible reasons. For example, they should consider the require about market. People do not buy wool clothes if no one like it after five years that wool clothes become propular any more. Even if the wool clothes still propual in nowtoday market. We do not whether appear new marteril that more and more fashion and cheap than the company have. In this way, people are still not buy the wool clothes with a new marteils.In that situation, it seems the author cannot justifiably conclude that they should resume production. So, just as discussed above, in order to make the claim more forceful, the arguer should provide more information about the condiction of nowtody market and the matrily in today.
Secondly, the author employs the evidence that there will be pent-up customer demand since the complany's major competitor no longer makes an alpaca covercoat to prove his conclusion. The argument's conclusion depends on the assumption that now market and five years ago markets have shared same condision, but the author does not supply any evidence to confirm this assumption. It is quite possible other reasons. For example, the fashion tend is changed, people do not like wool clothes. Maybe in this cause, the major competitorn no longer produce wool clothes. Even if the market is still prpuary, but we do not know the price of a new materilas. If the price is so high, there are little people could ability to buy it, the complany can not have much profits.Without accounting for anf ruling out the trends of nowtaday market, the wool clothes' price and the buy ability of people, the author cannot bolster the argument.
Additionalyy, the author claims that the complany profits will increase to demonstrate his conclusion. The assumption made by the author to arrive at the conclusion is that the profits just relevent with require from market, but the author offers no evidence to substantiate this crucial assumption. It is just as possibility other reasons. For example, we do not know whether it is have require. Even though there has require, we do not know the expension of cost, transport and making. Even if the complany can have some profits depend on the wool clothes, it can not replevent all complany will increase profits. Maybe the wool clothes are opputy a little precent of the complany. The complany have other production with losing money. The author's reasoning is definitely flawed unless he can convince me that the require of market, the cost and precent of complany and other possible scenarios are unlikely.
To sum up, the author's argument mentioned above is based on several unconvincing evidence. In order to draw a better conclusion, the author should present us with more revelant explanatons, such as the require of market and the cost of complany to suppor his argument. Before more information procided, the argument should be considered prudently.
举一反三如何书写地道作文--->上朗播网
1.
Only through mistakes can there be discovery or progress.
2.
People attend college or university for many different reasons (for example, new experiences, career...
3.
People attend college or university for many different reasons (for example, new experiences, career...
4.
The arts (painting, music, literature, etc.) reveal the otherwise hidden ideas and impulses of a soc...
5.
A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter coll...