High education is always considered as very valuable experience in a peroson's life.But there are not enough resource to enable everyone to have the opportunity to have high education.So some people think we need to concentrate all the resource on the good student.But I can hardly agree on this opinion.What is a good student?High academic grades?Good personalities?Or having talents in sports?High academic grades may mean this student have a great ability to learn the lessons and is good at exams.But what if he doesn't behave well in daily life,such as taking drugs,brawling in the streets?Is that the person the college needs and the society needs?Of course not.And also some so-called bad students may do better than the good ones.A friend of mine didn't have very beautiful grades.But he changed a lot after entering the college.He found himself interested in the major he chose.And he did very well in the classes he took.Finally he found a good job after the graduation.So approaching the students by some standards is not actually a good method.To these people who haven't had high education but already work in the society,it's still necessary to experience it.The experience of high education not only gives them the knowledge they don't have but also let them have opportunities to meet a lot of people to expand his social network.For example,many entrepreneurs choose to have high education even when they are already successful.Because high education will make them know what they don't know before but may help them to manage the company they own.Although I agree it's still a big problem to arrange the resource to make everyone have high education, that's not the excuse to  deprive the bad students' rights to have high education.We should try our best to create more persons that benefit out society to produce more resource.That's what we should do.So I think it's still necessary to make everyone have high education.