GRE 作文题目 来源于朗播用户:罗伯翰
[Claim] Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed. [Reason] It is inappropriate—and, perhaps, even cruel—to use public resources to fund the arts when people's basic needs are not being met. [Specific Task Instruction: Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.]
题目分析
翻译
[观点]当一个国家中大多数公民还处于饥饿和失业状态的时候,国家应该暂停对艺术的政府资助。 [理由]当人们的基本需求没有被满足的时候,用公共资源去自助艺术是不合适甚至残忍的。 [说明]写一篇文章,讨论你同意或反对这个观点,以及支持观点的理由达到怎样的程度。
指导
本题改编自老GRE的ISSUE190"As long as people in a society are hungry or out of work or lack the basic skills needed to survive, the use of public resources to support the arts is inappropriate -- and, perhaps, even cruel -- when one considers all the potential uses of such money"。题目讨论公共资源支持艺术发展的合理性问题,题目认为相对于艺术,资金更应当用于解决社会基本问题(饥饿、失业)。在分析的过程中,可以从社会基本问题和艺术发展各自的重要性以及忽视之后可能带来的直接和间接后果、资金支持在二者发展之中的必要性以及效率效果等方面展开思考。对于此题这种对比型的题目,需要注意不应孤立得去说二者各自的利弊,而是应当将二者放在一起通过对比、类比等方法将差异展现出来,这样才能说明哪个更好。
1. 对于社会基础问题以及艺术发展,现在各国的投资支持态度是如何的?请描述具体某国家的情况,并评价其是否合理以及原因。
回答: 肯定是人民多,艺术少
2. 社会基础问题(饥饿、失业)得不到解决会对社会产生哪些不良影响?请举例并简述。
回答: 混乱,恶性循环,影响经济发展
3. 在社会基础问题解决之前是否其他任何投资行为都是不合适的?能否因为社会基础未得到解决就不去用公共资源支持艺术?请解释其中的原因。
回答: 是的,这样做只会加大贫富差距
4. 如果一个国家专注于改善其社会基础而忽视了艺术发展,该国的发展会出现哪些问题?请举例并简述。
回答: 人民精神生活得不到提高
5. 社会基础问题和艺术二者之间存在哪些相互影响?请举例并简述。
回答: 先后问题
其他用户的回答
作文
I cannot agree more about the claim which the author gives. Government should fund and help the hungry and unemployed citizens first instead of arts. In my point of view, citizens are the basic element and the infrastrcture of a city, therefore, their situations directly decide the development of a city and its economy.
Without the enough endoresement by the government, the number of hungry and unemployed people will increase which will cause a severe circulation. The population of hunger and unemployment is closely related to the economy of the city and even the whole country. Taking Greece of an example, the economy of this country is really terrible which cause a huge number of people losing their job or living in a poor condition. Some extreme action occurs more frequent than before such as violence, demonstration, steal and even murder. If the government continully invested the money for the art field, the national depression will become irreversible and the country will crash. In a word, the population of the hungry and unemployed people impede the development of a city. Even the art enterprise of the city is really advanced; government must solve the problems of material life of the citizens.
Nonetheless, art is an essential factor for a city which can be treated as the mental life of the citizens, therefore, must be funded as well. If the number of hungry and unemployed citizens can be controlled within a accepted value, funding for art is really a good way to develop the city and can give citizens a better life. People living in a good material life but without enough mental support will also cause some problems which in relation to, for instant, morality. Thus, art should be funded only if the problems of the hungry and employed citizens have been sloved.
To conclude, funding the art regardless of a large number of hungry and unemployed citizens can make a larger gap between rich and poor. The rich will own more wealth and meanwhile, more people will suffer form starvation and unemployment. This kind of nonuniform distribution of resource gives birth to the imbalance of the society. Therefore, the main task of government is to try their best to give better life for the poor people.
写作指导
写作指导启发思路,积累素材,有效解决写作没思路、没素材的问题。
观看名师讲解,边看边学!
轻松扫一扫,有趣又有料
10G 托福视频教程分享群
374897650
10G GRE 视频教程分享群
305634398

请选择发起聊天的方式:

安装 QQ