Why there are so many TV serious showing the luxury life in banquets, or the process to win the election of President? It's obvious that people inherently look forward to frame and wealth nowadays. Therefore, the amount of students who study for success in frame and wealth is not small, which leads to an critical opinion: educational institute should dissuade students from studying the field they are unlikely to success. However, in my opinion, there is no need for a school or institute to discourage any student pursuing the field in study for so-called success. First of all, future success cannot be forecasted because of the historical limitation of human. Historically, human is not sophisticated enough to make a decision that can still work in the future. A typical example is the Newton's law. He conclued the rules of the movement of every matter that we can see in this world. But the law expired in the micro world, which we observe later by microscope. The most significant reason is that the microscope is not so prevail at that time, and it is this historical situation that limits Newton to take the movement of micro particles into consideration. So it's apparently to know that people cannot make a absolutely judgement about the future only according to the situation at that time. In this way, the educational institute cannot judge a student will succeed or not in the future, then how can he decide to dissuade the student or not?  Even if one's major field seemed useless or fail, it will not represent that he may not make it. Just as Steven Jobs, the ex-chairman of APPLE company, renovate the telephone sphere by putting forward an idea of elaborate and highly-quantity mobile phone. Ironically, he did not do well in his study field for his college time. So he dropped the course and attend artistic calligraphy one, which seemed more unlikely to be succeed at that time. However, it is the his calligraphic background give the birth of the first elaborate Macbook after some decades. Jobs is the one prove that not been dissuaded from unsuccessful study field is benefit. Since the success cannot be forecasted, one should comprehensively develop himself to be a successful man. Another reason that I disagree the issue is that a useful educational institute plays more essential role in giving a stage students to develop and practice than urge them do well in studying a specific field. So I don't think it has the responsibility to dissuade or encourage students to study any field. Making choice about study major is students' own business. But it's a great idea to give some financial support to student communities, which can manage some activities to improve the students ability of social interact or team-work spirit. Teachers never stuff knowledge into students' brain, but induce them to think critically and independently. These kinds of abilities are as much important as the study of major field. Although every educational institute hope their students succeed, no one can foreknow the success will arrive, so it should not change one's study life only depend on subject judgement about whether he is likely or unlikely to succeed. Moreover, a responsible and useful education would develop the student's ability including social contact and critical thinking, instead of just focus on the study field of them.