Education should one of the most significant matters for an individual and also for the society and everyone have some responsibilities to bear for education of themselves or others. To be specific, educational institutions do have assumed some great responsibilities for all their possible students. As a consequence, what responsibilities are supposed to be shouldered or not by these institutions becomes a controversial issue and some people specifically suggest that educational institutions should persuade students not to pursue the domains of study in which they are not likely to succeed. However, some crucial problems have to be answered before we could accept and follow this suggestion. First, what is success? Before you can scientifically define “success”, it is impossible for you to precisely predict one’s success or failure in certain fields of study. However, the criterion of being successful are difficult to unify even to identify, because it varies from person to person and also from profession to profession. For example, to some extent making more money could be a possible indicator of one’s success in areas concerned with economical study, yet it can hardly be correlated with someone who is a literature professor, who study is not evaluated by the money it can make but by the quality of its thesis, dissertations or works. On the other hand, for an economics student who is pragmatic and does not like theory study, the criterion of his or her could be really practical, like making more money or getting a high position in a company. On the contrary, for a student who is fond of theory of economics and is solitary and not social, success is more likely to be a professor in a university rather than to strive for something that are against their willing and ideals. Second, even if someone could scientifically explain what the universal success is, he or she is of little chance to reliably foretell other person’s success or failure in the future just based on analysis of one’s current situation. Although it is undeniable that in some extreme cases, you can foresee that one person is not possible to succeed in certain field, for instance a deaf student who wants to learn singing or playing piano, or a blind pupil who is determined to learn painting, in most cases, such prophecy can hardly to be dependable or fulfilled because things always change. For example, the world-famous Chinese artist, named Chen Danqing, had been dissuaded from learning fine arts by one of his teacher. But he was and is devoted into artistic creation and had not given up his struggle even and now he is enjoying fame and more importantly the pleasure of creating. In conclusion, educational institutions are not responsible to dissuade a student from entering into the fields in which they are not quite possible to succeed unless those institutions could provide scientifically identified criteriums of success in their fields and that they are completely sure the students are unlikely to succeed because of their extreme situations.