GRE 作文题目 来源于朗播用户:sun_573
[Claim] Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts. [Reason] Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public. [Specific Task Instruction: Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.]
题目分析
翻译
[观点] 主要的政策决定往往应该留给政治家和其他政府专家们。 [理由] 政治家和其他政府专家们相对公众来说见多识广,并且因此能有更好的判断力和看法。 [说明] 写一篇文章,讨论你同意或反对这个观点,以及支持观点的理由达到怎样的程度。
指导
本题改编自老GRE的ISSUE79"Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts, who are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public"。题目讨论政策决定制定者的选择,题目认为从见识、判断力和看法角度,政治家和政府专家要比公众更适合。在分析的过程中,可以从二者的差异、对政策的影响和决定过程中起到的不同作用以及各自的优势与不足等方面展开思考。
1. 请列举三条有代表性的重大政策决定,并简述这些决定的制定者是谁。
回答: 1
2. 政治家和其他政府专家在制定主要的政策决定的过程中有哪些优势和不足?请举例并简述。
回答: 考虑自己的利益,缺乏实践性
3. 如果让公众去做政策决定,他们的决定和政治家的决定会有哪些差异?有哪些优点以及会出现的潜在问题?请举例并简述。
回答: 眼光比较短浅,解决实际问题
4. 政治家、政府专家与公众相比,判断力和观点看法在哪些方面有着何种程度的不同?请举例并简述。
回答: 有专业的眼光
5. 见识广、更好的判断力和看法在主要政策决定的过程中起到了哪些作用?请举例并简述。
回答: 决策优化
其他用户的回答
作文
With the wheel of history, the whole world has progressed in modern policy, in modern society, one of the most common conception is the decrocracy,  whose main point is the people own the power.  Thus, when a government makea decisions, people's view must play a important role in decision making process, yet the politicians and other government experts are also involved, rather than only left to them.
     When a historic decision has made, people has made great contribution to every aspect of it such as the factors cause the original ideas, the process of evaluations, and the final conclusion which has come out.  In these days,  an effective  government is always on behallf of what people think, and is expected to solve the problems that meet with the civil demands.  So all that mentioned are willing to come true, the governent should take people into account.  Additionally, when government making decisions, it would not be always left to the professional staff, or the decisions are likely to be unfair.
     As we know, polititions, who are representatives of different parties, would try their best to realize the parties and other institutions that support them financially, thus it possibly would lead the decision making process into a unfair way to some extent, and finally beome corruption.  Even though we should not leave such a basied impression of them, it has been in existen for a long time.  On the other hand, experts has made the decision more professional and provide the knowledege supports, however, there is a apparent flaw that experts are always consider problems in an ideal way, without considering the facts that change every second.
   But we are ready to see clearly that without politicions or government experts, we are afraid not to make professional, efficient and perfect decisions.  Say that politicons would solve the civil problems with a long prospective,  which could have more profoundly affect, while the experts would have experience when solving the professional problems.  To some degree, we should admit that only rely on people's decisions,  there would be some shortcomings like short of global view, only  focus on the facial problems.
   To sum up, a powerful government should consider all aspects of views, thus the three part has different positions, and I would like to reiterate that when government makes decisions, people must be considered, rather than only left to politicians and expers.
写作指导
写作指导启发思路,积累素材,有效解决写作没思路、没素材的问题。
观看名师讲解,边看边学!
轻松扫一扫,有趣又有料
10G 托福视频教程分享群
374897650
10G GRE 视频教程分享群
305634398

请选择发起聊天的方式:

安装 QQ