GRE 作文题目 来源于朗播用户:杨鸿博
Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain. [Specific Task Instruction: Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.]
题目分析
翻译
国家应该出台法律保持现存所有荒地的原始状态,尽管这些地区可以为了经济利益而被开发。[说明:写一篇文章,讨论你对于这个政策的观点,并解释你选择这个观点的理由。在展开和支持你的观点时,你需要考虑这个政策生效以后可能带来的结果,并解释这些结果如何支持了你的观点]
指导
本题改编自老GRE的ISSUE83"Government should preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural state, even though these areas are often extremely remote and thus accessible to only a few people"。题目讨论对荒地原始状态保持的问题,题目认为这种措施是“应该执行”的。在分析的过程中,可以从国家责任本身要考虑的内容、荒地原始状态的保持满足了哪些需求、荒地对人们生活的正负面和直接间接影响等方面展开思考。
1. 请结合具体事例分析:哪些荒地因为政府没有进行有效保护,给人们带来了负面影响;有哪些原始荒地因为政府的开发而带来了更多的价值?
回答: ...is a solid example that shows that properly exploration of a wilderness can bring us great fortune and wealth
2. 对国家而言,处于原始状态的公有荒地存在哪些直接价值和潜在价值?可尝试从经济、科技、政治、军事、教育、文化等角度思考。
回答: being used as
3. 除了保持荒地原始状态之外,国家还可以利用荒地进行哪些活动?这些活动的直接价值和潜在利益有哪些?可尝试从经济、科技、政治、军事、教育、文化等角度思考。
回答:
4. 对于的荒地,应该如何平衡开发与保持原状态的利弊?请结合以上分析做判断。
回答:
5. 国家在保持公有荒地原始状态过程中的收益是否大于付出?
回答:
其他用户的回答
作文
A nation may,in order to be prosperous,need to improve its economy.A nation with steady and good economy can sustain and promote the well-being of its citizens.Many nations with a compatively good economy has done so through its cutting-edge technology.But exploring natural resources is also a good way to achieve this goal.However,wether a nation should pass laws to preserve remaining wilderness areas in their natural state is a contentious issue,some may agree with the claim,but some may not.I am more inclined to disagree with the claim if these areas can be developed for economic gain.First,the main purpose for a country is to find ways to improve the quality of life of its people.Economy,as a crucial factor for a country to thrive,should be improved.If there is abundant natural resources to be explored in an area,nations should endeavor to take good use of it.A wilderness area containing affluent resources of ore can be explored for ore mining.If the final purpose and result is good for the people and for the nation,why not do it?There is no reason to keep a wilderness in its natural state if we can get the things that are good for ourselves.In the contemporary world,resources has been dimishing due to the unreasonable abuses by human beings,it is true that we should be responsible for the present situation that we are facing.Global warming,increasing amount of carben dioxide in the atmosphere etc.If this trend keep going,if no new resources being found,ultimately,we run out of our resources.Besides,if we find out that a place is abundant with petroleum,we should develop it and explore it for economic benefits.Also,any wilderness,even if may not be able to be used as a natural resources,but if it itself is a natural and good place for the development of tourism.Thus can improve our economy,we should implement it.Many national parks in the United States can be seen as some natural wilderness areas.Yellowstone National Park is a good example.Considering its beauty in nature,it has been served to the benefit of tourism.Millions of tourists come the park to enjoy their vacation and embrace the beauty of nature.At the same time it facilitate the development of economy.Las Vegas,a city of enterntainment,a "sin ciy",a city in the desert,is also a good example that shows that it is important to exploit the things that can do us good.Las Vegas used to be a wilderness in the desert,before it become what it is today.However,with good exploration and appropriate development,a city was founded and well so developed.If people originally just keep it as what is was,it would be a loss to tons of the people in the world.Finally,considering the geological factors about any wilderness area,it would be wise to think before we decide wether to develop this place for economy or not.A lot of wilderness areas exist on earth in different places,some areas are really too remote or too unthinkable to be developed for the economic gain.Amazon jungles has many natural resources,but people never think of it as a good place for economic gain.It might be a natural place for scientific research in some specific fields of study,but there is no need to use for economy.In conclusion,taking into account all the above mentioned reasons i cannot agree with the assertion that a nation should pass laws to preserve any remainning wilderness areas in their natural state.If it can be used for economic gain and do no harm to the people and the nation,there is no reason that we leave it alone,but thinking about natural elements such as geological position, of some wilderness,it might be better we keep it as what it is.
写作指导
写作指导启发思路,积累素材,有效解决写作没思路、没素材的问题。
观看名师讲解,边看边学!
轻松扫一扫,有趣又有料
10G 托福视频教程分享群
374897650
10G GRE 视频教程分享群
305634398

请选择发起聊天的方式:

安装 QQ