Some people believe that government’s financial support render the arts booming and widespread, others believe that government funding of the arts inhibit the growth of arts. In my view the primary requirement for the arts is their integrity must be protected form government’s control，though the arts need enough financial supports which government are capable to satisfy.   Admittedly, government can serve as a tool to amass enough money for the using of arts from all aspects and provide all kinds of stages for the arts to present. By the financial supporting, various fresh works are produced in quantity, available to let more people get in touch with the arts, through exibitions, TV shows, movies or music albums. At the same time, the quality of these art works are definitlly far more delicate through sophisticated production, such as a magnificent scene in a movie needing a large cost. Moreover, under some circumstance, government support can save the arts. For example, various traditional chinese operas, which is hardly accepted by people, especially young people nowadays but precious cultural heritage, escape from vanishing with the help of gorvenment. CCTV even sets up a opera channel to preserve and spread this traditional art.   Aside from the foregoing benefits can gorvenment render to the arts, however, wheather this treatment, as to developing the arts as a sort of industry for interest and high popularizing, is the suitable way of development for the arts is worth to be doubted. As we all know, the taste of people for the arts differs from person to person that for the public, perhaps, they don’t need so much information of every sort of art. Combined with the potential adverse effect that widely publication can lead the arts into worldly and mundane condition, the role government play involving the development of the arts must be questioned.   The most significant impact that government places on the arts is undermining the integrity of the arts. Considering the property of the government, it is not hard to understand that one of the purposes of government’s support is guiding the social mainstream ideas by embeding the wills of the government to the art works. Government expect that art works can reflect the social values conducive to its leadership and consider the works including contents that against the mainstream value as the works should be banned. For instance, many movies were cliped , like Titanic, and many were even banned when played in the cinema in China. This undue intervention of government heavily limit the free presentation of the arts.   In sum, the nature of the arts call for more a free creative environment than a large amount of money. Hardly can the arts go towords real flurish, without the right of expressing the artists’ real notion.