GRE 作文题目
来源于朗播用户：emily_883
Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear. [Specific Task Instruction: Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.]
题目分析
翻译
政府不应该去资助任何预期结果不明确的科学研究 。[说明：写一篇文章，讨论你同意或反对这个建议达到什么程度，并解释你选择这个观点的理由。在展开和支持你的观点时，你要描述在具体的环境中，采纳这个建议可能会有什么好处，或不会有什么好处，并解释这些例子如何体现了你的观点]
指导
本题改编自老GRE的ISSUE44"Government should not fund any scientific research whose consequences, either medical or ethical, are unclear"。题目实际上是讨论结果不明确的科学研究是否有价值，是否应该获得政府支持的问题。分析的重点应该是两个：一是研究结果的确定性是否和研究的价值有关系；二是政府投资应该考虑哪些问题。
写作思路 学会梳理作文思路--->上朗播网
1. 描述一个结果并不确定的研究内容，并分析这一研究是否有价值，为什么？
回答：
whether there are liquid water on there planets.
when the water resource on the earth were used up, the
2. 从政府角度出发，判断某一研究是否有价值的依据有哪些？
回答：
1 whether the research has done anything good to human
2 whether the research has improve the development of the society
3 whether the research has promote the advancement of technology
3. 描述一个国家支持的有关研究项目，其结果在研究前是不确定的。分析研究后产生的结果给国家带来了什么好处和问题。
回答：
杂交水稻的广泛应用大幅度提高了水稻产量，为解决我国十几亿人口大国的粮食自给难题做出了不可磨灭的贡献
4. 科学研究通常会给国家、社会和人类带来什么好处和问题？请举例说明。
回答：
推动国家科技发展，提高生活水平 促进社会和谐
没有结果之前，特不到人民理解，浪费财力，人民不满，社会不安定
nuclear power :核能发电不会造成空气污染。核能发电不会产生加重地球温室效应的二氧化碳
核电厂的反应器内有大量的放射性物质，如果在事故中释放到外界环境，会对生态及民众造成伤害。
其他用户的回答
作文
It is obviously that the main purpose of scientific research is to discover the unknown realm of knowledge, and the result of the research is mostly unpredictable. The speaker asserts that government should not fund any scientific research whose results are unclear, however, I think the speaker is injudicious to coming up such conclusion.
The statement attempts to claim that any research whose results are unclear should not be supported by the government, and the assumption, from my perspective view, might be that such research would be a waste of financial resources. Indeed, to invest a wealth of budget into an unknown research is a kind of risky for the government. What if the research failed to come to a desirable effect which was supposed to reach? What if after so many efforts,the money, time and labor are in vine. Considering this, it is reasonable for the governments to think carefully about whether to support a research.
However, governments should not against a scientific research only on account of its unknown result. Since in that way, a lot of potential great discoveries would slip through our fingers. At times, a seemingly undesirable research would surprise you.For instance, when scientist first began to study the pig nose, it seemed very ridiculous for the public. Surprisingly, scientists invented gas mask, which provides long lasting benefits to us, based on the function and outlook of pig noses . Furthermore, governments should give priority to the research which can solve the most emergent problems. It is both significant finding ways to solve the water pollution and discovering the outer space to detect new resources. However, because of the limited governmental budget and the serious environmental pollution all the human were facing now,the government surely should support the former in the first place. Judging whether a research is deserve to support, the primary criterion for the government to evaluate is whether the research can solve the most serious problem the whole society is facing now. To sum up, it is unjustifiable for the government to resist any scientific research whose results are unknown. When making decisions, the government should consider both the probable result of the research and the funding budget. When the research is benefit both the people and the cost is affordable, the government should spare no effort to support it.
The statement attempts to claim that any research whose results are unclear should not be supported by the government, and the assumption, from my perspective view, might be that such research would be a waste of financial resources. Indeed, to invest a wealth of budget into an unknown research is a kind of risky for the government. What if the research failed to come to a desirable effect which was supposed to reach? What if after so many efforts,the money, time and labor are in vine. Considering this, it is reasonable for the governments to think carefully about whether to support a research.
However, governments should not against a scientific research only on account of its unknown result. Since in that way, a lot of potential great discoveries would slip through our fingers. At times, a seemingly undesirable research would surprise you.For instance, when scientist first began to study the pig nose, it seemed very ridiculous for the public. Surprisingly, scientists invented gas mask, which provides long lasting benefits to us, based on the function and outlook of pig noses . Furthermore, governments should give priority to the research which can solve the most emergent problems. It is both significant finding ways to solve the water pollution and discovering the outer space to detect new resources. However, because of the limited governmental budget and the serious environmental pollution all the human were facing now,the government surely should support the former in the first place. Judging whether a research is deserve to support, the primary criterion for the government to evaluate is whether the research can solve the most serious problem the whole society is facing now. To sum up, it is unjustifiable for the government to resist any scientific research whose results are unknown. When making decisions, the government should consider both the probable result of the research and the funding budget. When the research is benefit both the people and the cost is affordable, the government should spare no effort to support it.
举一反三如何书写地道作文--->上朗播网
1.
Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in...
2.
Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field o...
3.
The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists...
4.
Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in...
5.
Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flo...