开头空缺
First of all, the government and the develop of science exert mutual influence on each other. On one hand, the government is both a patron and an administrator of the scientific research. Government's funding is a great part of all the reaserch funds of the science. At the same time, government use its power to manage many aspect of the science, to guide its direction, to constrain the illegal research.
Secondly, if the scientific research and development are in no restrictions, there will be both advantages and disadvantages. For the advantages, unlimitation of the science wiil remove the political stress exerted on the scientific research, which means the research was guided in the way whatever the unprofessional government wanted rather than by someone professional in such field. Therefore, the research would be more specific, efficient and on the right way, and at the same time the achievements would have been more than before. In a word, freedom of the development of scientific will prompt the science. For example, the medical technology's improvemt made us live longer, the biology's improvement helped us created many bio-simulation inventions, and the nuclear technology provided us more access to the use of electricity.
For the disadvantages, firstly there will be unethical and illegal research taken places. I can take some case for instance. In the medical research field, new dopes and drugs will start to come out more rapidly than ever; in the biology field, cloning technology will develop without limitation, which now has causing a lot of ethical and moral debate. What's more, some benificial technology might at the same time threat the people. The nuclear power plants are one of the typical examples. They provide us clear power to use in the production and our daily life. But once there is something wrong-- the mistakes made by the operators, the damage made by earthquakes, it might cause great harm to the people and the environment. Such as the great earthquake happened in Japan in March, 2011 has led to the leak of a couple of nuclear leakage, affecting the local environment and people badly. At last, the unrestriction might render the waste of resources, since there will be many more unresonable researches lacking scientific evidence conducted by some unqualified scientists.
However, imposing restriction on the scientific research might simutaneously bring some drawbacks on the science.
Finally, in my perspective, what the government should do is to impose limited restrictions on the scientific research and then guide them rationaly by professional official. The government should abandon the political stress and influence in the scientific activities as more as possible, leaving the scientific research a clearer and more uninterupted circumstance. Also government should make a reasonable distribution of resources on every field of science. Because that some of the long-term researches can not produce achievements as well as the revenue in a relatively short period of time. But what the history tell us is that it is always such long-term and seemingly useless research that really spur the science to progress considerably.