GRE 作文题目
来源于朗播用户：lynn_814
Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them. [Specific Task Instruction: Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.]
题目分析
翻译
教育家应该找出学生想要在课程中得到什么，然后提供给他们。[说明：写一篇文章，讨论你同意或反对这个建议达到什么程度，并解释你选择这个观点的理由。在展开和支持你的观点时，你要描述在具体的环境中，采纳这个建议可能会有什么好处，或不会有什么好处，并解释这些例子如何体现了你的观点]
指导
题目讨论授课内容与学生需求之间的关系。本题是很常见的话题，但分析时要注意以下三点：
1、分析可以面向各个教学阶段以及不同学科；
2、从教师和学生“互动”的角度考虑问题；
3、分析的时候要避免偏激思路，虽然大家都是从应试教育阶段走过来的，但是要注意：可以排斥但是言语不要过激。
写作思路 学会梳理作文思路--->上朗播网
1. 结合你的经验，请分析并列举，教育家或者教师的职责包括哪些？
回答：
教育家和老师的职责是让学生掌握应有的知识，学会如何做人。
2. 结合你的经验，请分析并列举，学生想要在课程中得到什么？
回答：
得到对这门课的基本知识，如何应用这门课的知识。
3. 如果在授课的过程中，教育家严格并且完全地满足学生想要在课程中得到的内容，这会对教学以及其效果有哪些影响？请举例并简述。
回答：
首先，学生想要得到的内容不一定是完全有用的内容；
其次，一门课程中也不可能将该讲的课程，完全讲完；
课程中的内容分主次，次要的内容会一略而过
4. 如果在授课的过程中，教育家完全忽视学生想要在课程中得到什么，这会对教学以及其效果有哪些影响？请举例并简述。
回答：
激发不起学生的学习兴趣，大家会不想学习
5. 你认为的，在授课过程中，应该怎样参考学生的需要比较合适？请简述。
回答：
如果学生想得到的内容确实很重要，那么应该尽量满足其需要；如果想知道的内容不利于学习该课程就没必要讲；如果该内容不重要也没必要细讲，因为其他同学可能并不想听
其他用户的回答
作文
With the rapid development of the society, more and more people begin to focus on the educaton issues,and the how to deal with the relationship between the curriculum and the intrest in learning has become a top priority.The statement shows that educators are considering if they should offer all the knowledge included in curriculum to the students, however, they should seriously reflect how to stimulate the academic ability of the students.
It is our common sense that it is entirely impossible that we could control over the curriculum. Nowadays,schools are providing the variable courses for the students to choose,of course geting enough credits for graduation is the first thing to consider.Superfically, in the studying, the initial studying material may be directed by the students, but the process of choosing the curriculum is allowed by the educators;however, letting the students independently set the corricilun will debase the quality of educaton unless the educators can guide them by the side. The diffrent stages of the learning determines to solve the learning problems differently.
In the elementary school, the students are not old enough to learn to what the should learn. The educators should devote a quantity of time to setting the curriculum and establishing a perfect teaching programs promoting the comprehensive developments.In this time, the students are mostly studying the book knowledge, and the other knowledge is less offered.While, in the high school,the students are concerning more and more on how to develop a good habit of studing and the how to be a social person.The best school is to promote an enviroment in which individual creativity can be well develop, where students think of themselves and express the problems in a scholarly way.The students should also emphasize cultivating the ability of teamwork.What the detail students learn from the books is less important as long as their mind is cultivated.
In conclusion, it is not right for the educators to deterine the curriculum and just provide the knowledge to the students.One successful way,is to provide students the choices within the premise of "what needs to be conveyed".The educators's aim is to let the students develop healthily and comprehensively, not just providing the details of the curriculum.
It is our common sense that it is entirely impossible that we could control over the curriculum. Nowadays,schools are providing the variable courses for the students to choose,of course geting enough credits for graduation is the first thing to consider.Superfically, in the studying, the initial studying material may be directed by the students, but the process of choosing the curriculum is allowed by the educators;however, letting the students independently set the corricilun will debase the quality of educaton unless the educators can guide them by the side. The diffrent stages of the learning determines to solve the learning problems differently.
In the elementary school, the students are not old enough to learn to what the should learn. The educators should devote a quantity of time to setting the curriculum and establishing a perfect teaching programs promoting the comprehensive developments.In this time, the students are mostly studying the book knowledge, and the other knowledge is less offered.While, in the high school,the students are concerning more and more on how to develop a good habit of studing and the how to be a social person.The best school is to promote an enviroment in which individual creativity can be well develop, where students think of themselves and express the problems in a scholarly way.The students should also emphasize cultivating the ability of teamwork.What the detail students learn from the books is less important as long as their mind is cultivated.
In conclusion, it is not right for the educators to deterine the curriculum and just provide the knowledge to the students.One successful way,is to provide students the choices within the premise of "what needs to be conveyed".The educators's aim is to let the students develop healthily and comprehensively, not just providing the details of the curriculum.
举一反三如何书写地道作文--->上朗播网
1.
It is a grave mistake to theorize before one has data.
2.
It is the artist, not the critic,* who gives society something of lasting value.(*a person who evalu...
3.
Such nonmainstream areas of inquiry as astrology, fortunetelling, and psychic and paranormal pursuit...
4.
The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and wom...
5.
The stability of a society depends on how it responds to the extremes of human behavior.