The objective of education should not only be those to provide society technicians who possess an enormous amount of skill and thus are conversant with all knowledge in their own field, but also should contain the art and spiritual creators and thinkers to help solve the fundamental questions faced by humans. Consequetly, the encouragement by the edaucation institutions for students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers may be so limited, for both the job markets and the society, and the students themselves, despite its some advatages.For the whole society and the development of the dscipline, all students are advised to study in the fields like law, economy, medicine and etc, which are likely to asssure them a higher salary in the future career than other areas like archeology, philosophy and ancient literature. The the latter disciplines are expected to encounter regression, which in turn leads to less students to engage in, subsequently, the future disciplines may get narrower and narrower for later students. It surely is not what most people would like to anticipate.In addition, as a freshman, the student is likely to know nothing about the courses and the current conditions of the job market, and even what their interests reside in, thus, following the advices by the educational institutions institaneously may be contradict to their own interests. If it is the case, then the following courses and programs can be very hard for the students to learn because of his no interests and enthusiasm in the field. At that time, regretting for the choise bears nothing to get the time back.Having said this, we do not deny that stepping in the field that may lead students to lucrative careers will totally direct the students to a bleak future. On the contrary, the benefits of such encourgements are obvious as it can galvanize students to study much more arduously in order to be choosen by the future employers. Hence students possessing such convinctions usually gain better performance than othersTtake a economy students as an example, she chose the major of international economy and relationship, following the advise of both her parents and the teachers in the educational institutions. Due to her desire to make more money in the future career, she studied much harder than other students in her department and always got straight A in each semester, and finally got a decent job in a famous international bank. Since education's comprehensive content and objectives, such better performance should not be the only aim of  both teachers and students, for the reason that such utilitarian stimulation may cause the students's learning much limited, by neglecting those curriculua not directly relevant with their future career. For example, a civil engineering student may be unwilling to take the linguistic courses for they have nothing to do with his future occupation as an egineering. But who can forecast the future, chances are high that they may use such knowledge.In conclusion, as the educational institutions, they may instruct students the current conditions of the jb market and perspective field, as well as encourge those who want to persue their own interests, and then leave the choise to students themselves, for the sence that they have been adults and owns the ability to determine what they are going to take.