GRE 作文题目
来源于朗播用户：lovehp
The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries. [Specific Task Instruction: Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.]
题目分析
翻译
个人的伟大只能由后来的人评判，而不能由同时代的人评判。[说明：写一篇文章，讨论你同意或反对这个说法达到什么程度，并解释你选择这个观点的理由。在展开和支持你的观点时，你需要考虑这个说法可能在哪些方面成立或者不成立，并解释你所考虑的这些东西如何体现你的观点]
指导
本题为老GRE中的ISSUE36原题，和老GRE中的ISSUE241很相似（An individual's greatness cannot be judged objectively by his or her contemporaries; the most objective evaluators of a person's greatness are people who belong to a later time），都是在讨论评价者“合理性”的问题。实际情况是同代人和后代都在对“某人”进行评价，二者的视角、关注点、参考信息等因素都存在不同，这些不同也就影响了评价的效果。在分析的时候可以根据不同领域、不同事件以及不同的标准来展开思路。
写作思路 学会梳理作文思路--->上朗播网
1. 在你的印象中不同领域和不同层次的伟人有什么共性和个性？可结合具体事例简述。
回答：
共性是思想都比较超前，有时甚至于太超前以至于同时代的人无法理解。
个性是;有些伟人精神不太正常，有精神发面的疾病，当然也有可能是普通人无法理解其深意
2. 评判一个人是否伟大的时候，有没有一个普遍适用的标准？如果有，那么这个标准中包括哪些内容？如果没有，那应当如何去评判？
回答：
有一个普遍的标准：促进科技发展，改变人的生活方式（好的方向），揭示出某一深奥问题，或是解释神秘现象的原因
3. 后世人的评判和同代人评判有什么共性和区别？在这些区别中有哪些是后世人具有的优势，而且是同代人没有办法弥补的？
回答：
后世人更多的是站在真理，事事的角度去评价；同时代的，还是看重使用发面，还有和当时权威锁确定，认可的。
真相方面，有些理论可能提出来，被当代人认为很荒谬甚至是和他们认为的客观事实相反地，这些只有通过时间的检验，才能证明其greatness
4. 是否存在后代评价和同代人的评价差别很大的人物？造成差别的原因是什么？请结合具体事例说明。
回答：
其他用户的回答
作文
There exists a controversial issue that should people judge greatness by those who live after them, or by their contemporaries. Some people considers that only those who live after them could judge farily just, relying on facts supported those theory that created by greatness. Contrarily, other people back that greatness's contemporaries also could decide who could be a great. While, in my viewpoint, both of opinion have its advantages, I prefer the author's standpoint, that is I agree with the idea that greatness could be dicided by our offsprings and greatness's contemporaries.
Standards to decide who can be a greatness is nonexist, at least, is a general outline, which was synopsis of those great men. From those great men's characters, we can draw a conclusion that they all largely benefit to society, even human. Specially, those who promted the development of technology or some fields, such as math, charmistry, improved our living standard or illuminated some abstrue phenomenon are great men in our eyes. Speaking of which, Thomas Alva Edison and Steve Jobs recalls my mind, who are great men.
Granted that those common characters could be a standard to decide great men, it has shortages that it could not respect all aspets of greatness. Since the standard deciding greatness would chang with time fleeting, these alleged standards aren't perfactly flawless for those great men in our esys was judged by temporary standard created by us. Therefore, this kind of standard is more or less assiable. Perhaps, those great men who suits our contemporary standards were confronted with their contemporaries' perspective so that they were mocked by their contemporaries, even were antagnoized by public in their times. In particular, Mikolaj Kopernik,Michael Servetus,Galileo Galilei and Michael Servetus.
According to our nowadays standards to decide great men, if true, those great person who was decided by offsprings could be mocked by us. Because their thought are so profound that we might believe that the person must be dilirilum. Considering Vincent Willem van Gogh, one of most outstanding artists in history, which was slighted by his contemporaries.If we decided great men in out time, we might stress emphasis on a morsaic that consisted of utality and the degree of it defers autherity. For example, both Steve Jobs and Bill Gates are great men, as well as they change the world.
Overall, deciding great men could rely on all kind of atandards and people in any period, because the standard is never constant, in other words, with time fleeting, every generation have different standpoint about great men. Consequently, great men are in some degree, not solid, great men could change with time fleeting. Thus, I partly object to the author's idea that greatness of individuals could be decided only by offsprings.
Standards to decide who can be a greatness is nonexist, at least, is a general outline, which was synopsis of those great men. From those great men's characters, we can draw a conclusion that they all largely benefit to society, even human. Specially, those who promted the development of technology or some fields, such as math, charmistry, improved our living standard or illuminated some abstrue phenomenon are great men in our eyes. Speaking of which, Thomas Alva Edison and Steve Jobs recalls my mind, who are great men.
Granted that those common characters could be a standard to decide great men, it has shortages that it could not respect all aspets of greatness. Since the standard deciding greatness would chang with time fleeting, these alleged standards aren't perfactly flawless for those great men in our esys was judged by temporary standard created by us. Therefore, this kind of standard is more or less assiable. Perhaps, those great men who suits our contemporary standards were confronted with their contemporaries' perspective so that they were mocked by their contemporaries, even were antagnoized by public in their times. In particular, Mikolaj Kopernik,Michael Servetus,Galileo Galilei and Michael Servetus.
According to our nowadays standards to decide great men, if true, those great person who was decided by offsprings could be mocked by us. Because their thought are so profound that we might believe that the person must be dilirilum. Considering Vincent Willem van Gogh, one of most outstanding artists in history, which was slighted by his contemporaries.If we decided great men in out time, we might stress emphasis on a morsaic that consisted of utality and the degree of it defers autherity. For example, both Steve Jobs and Bill Gates are great men, as well as they change the world.
Overall, deciding great men could rely on all kind of atandards and people in any period, because the standard is never constant, in other words, with time fleeting, every generation have different standpoint about great men. Consequently, great men are in some degree, not solid, great men could change with time fleeting. Thus, I partly object to the author's idea that greatness of individuals could be decided only by offsprings.
举一反三如何书写地道作文--->上朗播网
1.
[Claim] In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after...
2.
Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in...
3.
Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field o...
4.
The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists...
5.
Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in...