GRE 作文题目
来源于朗播用户：帝江
It is more harmful to compromise one's own beliefs than to adhere to them. [Specific Task Instruction: Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.]
题目分析
翻译
对信仰妥协比坚持信仰更加糟糕。[说明：写一篇文章，讨论你同意或反对这个说法达到什么程度，并解释你选择这个观点的理由。在展开和支持你的观点时，你需要考虑这个说法可能在哪些方面成立或者不成立，并解释你所考虑的这些东西如何体现你的观点]
指导
本题改编自老GRE的ISSUE35"No matter what the situation, it is more harmful to compromise one's beliefs than to adhere to them"。题目可以从两个角度来进行阐述，一是“是否应该坚持信仰”，二是“放弃信仰是否比坚持信仰更糟糕”。观点一定要明确，并且从坚持或放弃信仰的条件，优缺点等角度进行思考。
写作思路 学会梳理作文思路--->上朗播网
1. 什么是信仰？你有什么信仰？描述一个自己或者别人的信仰。
回答：
a
2. 坚持信仰有什么好处？有什么缺点？请分别举例说明。
回答：
a
3. 哪些因素会导致人们放弃信仰？这样做有什么好处？有什么缺点？请分别举例说明。
回答：
a
4. 在什么条件下，人们应该坚持信仰？为什么？请举例说明。
回答：
a
5. 在什么条件下，人们应该放弃信仰？为什么？请举例说明。
回答：
a
其他用户的回答
作文
Once we've arrived at a certain conclusion, we're often told to be persistent and intransigent in our own beliefs to savor the predicted truimph of our persistence. Although in certain cases, such an attitude would help us to overcome the indifference or even hostility encountered initially, in other circumstances, this intransigence resembles foolhardy and is detrimental.
We were taught since we were young that the lsat thing we could ever do to defend our success is to persist and believe in ourselves. Doubtlessly, we need to be in failth of ourselves in order to seize the fruit of success. Suppose that we're so easy to be ramshackled, and swift from one theory to another consistently, then it's obviously that we could never be able to achieve anything great, since those brilliant thought, once they've appeared, would slipped away due to our diffident. On the contrary, individuals who choose to defend their arguments even when everyone else has turned against them may one day be able to persuade those dissenters and make a difference once for all. Actually, many of those great discoveries and profound revolutions were at first encountered countless skepcisms and misunderstandings. If those pioneers gave up their beliefs half the way and surrender to the main-stream tastes, then we could hardly make any advance and progress, but keep staying where we were, or even undergoes recession. Therefore, we should persist in our own beliefs no matter how disparate the situations are to embrace the light of intelligence.
However, it doesn't mean that we must not give up our own beliefs under no circumstances. If, for example, we've discovered that there're apparent flaws and fallacies inherent in our points of view, then a compromise or even abandonment of the original view would be both necessary and conducive to both ourselves as well as others. On the contrary, if we still choose to defend our erroneous modes of thought, then the devastating result would be self-evident. Even our beliefs are not completely wrong, adjustments and moderations are sometimes needed as well. No one is perfect, and so is our theory. There're bond to have inferiorities inherent in our beliefs. Thus, when the views of others could complement our beliefs to make for a more comprehensive one, we should never hesitate to modify our own.
In short, the assertion that it's more harmful to compromise our beliefs than to adhere to them is too arbitrary to be persuasive. Whether should we insist in our own beliefs depend on the validity and credibility of the sides we take. If we possess abundent evidence to justify our beliefs, then an adherence to the original one would be impeccable; but if the side we take is itself groundless and unconvincing, then an adjustment or even a complete abandonment of our views would be necessary.
We were taught since we were young that the lsat thing we could ever do to defend our success is to persist and believe in ourselves. Doubtlessly, we need to be in failth of ourselves in order to seize the fruit of success. Suppose that we're so easy to be ramshackled, and swift from one theory to another consistently, then it's obviously that we could never be able to achieve anything great, since those brilliant thought, once they've appeared, would slipped away due to our diffident. On the contrary, individuals who choose to defend their arguments even when everyone else has turned against them may one day be able to persuade those dissenters and make a difference once for all. Actually, many of those great discoveries and profound revolutions were at first encountered countless skepcisms and misunderstandings. If those pioneers gave up their beliefs half the way and surrender to the main-stream tastes, then we could hardly make any advance and progress, but keep staying where we were, or even undergoes recession. Therefore, we should persist in our own beliefs no matter how disparate the situations are to embrace the light of intelligence.
However, it doesn't mean that we must not give up our own beliefs under no circumstances. If, for example, we've discovered that there're apparent flaws and fallacies inherent in our points of view, then a compromise or even abandonment of the original view would be both necessary and conducive to both ourselves as well as others. On the contrary, if we still choose to defend our erroneous modes of thought, then the devastating result would be self-evident. Even our beliefs are not completely wrong, adjustments and moderations are sometimes needed as well. No one is perfect, and so is our theory. There're bond to have inferiorities inherent in our beliefs. Thus, when the views of others could complement our beliefs to make for a more comprehensive one, we should never hesitate to modify our own.
In short, the assertion that it's more harmful to compromise our beliefs than to adhere to them is too arbitrary to be persuasive. Whether should we insist in our own beliefs depend on the validity and credibility of the sides we take. If we possess abundent evidence to justify our beliefs, then an adherence to the original one would be impeccable; but if the side we take is itself groundless and unconvincing, then an adjustment or even a complete abandonment of our views would be necessary.
举一反三如何书写地道作文--->上朗播网
1.
[Claim] Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience. [Reason] People who lack experience ar...
2.
In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge. [Specific Tas...
3.
Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an...
4.
Some people believe that scientific discoveries have given us a much better understanding of the wor...
5.
In any profession—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after fi...