GRE 作文题目
来源于朗播用户:THOMAS
[Claim] We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own. [Reason] Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning. [Specific Task Instruction: Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.]
题目分析
翻译
[观点]相对于所持观点和我们矛盾的人,我们通常能从和我们持相同观点的人那里学到更多。
[理由]意见不合会产生压力并阻碍学习。
[说明]写一篇文章,讨论你同意或反对这个观点,以及支持观点的理由达到怎样的程度。
指导
本题改编自老GRE的ISSUE1"We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own; disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning"。题目讨论我们从观点相同或不同的人那里学习效果的不同。对于比较类分析,首先要承认的是两者各有优缺点,不过重点要探讨的是相比之下哪个优点或者缺点更多。在分析的时候需要注意"we"和"people"之间的联系应当只有views,而并不被其他关系影响(例如,亲友、团队、上下级等)。同时,也可以根据不同情况去进行分类。分析过程中要突出:learn(这是大多数习作中会忽视的关键词)
1. 你平时认为有欠缺的观点的主要特征有什么呢?
回答:
可能思考过于片面,理解不够深刻。
2. 请换位思考一下,平时你会怎样对待和你持有共同观点的人?对和你意见相矛盾的人的观点又会有怎样的对待呢?
回答:
意见相同的人比较好相处,不同的人,有时候会有些心理排斥。
3. 当面对两种不同行为的时候,你认为采取何种应对办法是最有效果的?请列举出你认为对这两种情况处理比较好的方法。
回答:
跟我观点一致的人,我更加亲近,不同的,我可以吸收一些我想要获得的东西。
4. 经过了对方或支持或反对,我们的观点会朝什么方向发展?观点的哪些地方会出现何种程度的进步或后退?
回答:
反对有时候其实一种激励,就是如果自己不完善,可能有了新的思考角度,如果自己觉得对,为了能过说服对方,可能会不断思考,进而更加完善自己以往的观念。
5. 如果和对方意见不合,你会有什么样的心理感受?进而会表现出什么样的行为?
回答:
有一定的心里抵触,但是会不断促使自己努力超越对方。
其他用户的回答
作文
it is common that people would prefer those who agree with them rather than disagree with them, since disagreement always results in a pressure. However, from my personal view, i believe that we could learn more from these opponents. it is easy to be thoughtless when one considers an issue, yet the disagreement could keep us from being blind in other aspects of this issue.the mind of individual is often limited by his or her life background,experience, or age and so on. Thus,his or her perception of thing might also be lack of comprehensive, and the disagreement could complement one's point.Just as the government always hold a public hearing, especially when it comes to some significant problem. through this way,the policymaker hope to gather different opinions from disparate people who live in various life class and engage in diverse employment. Thence all these voices, even they vary greatly, could constitute a more common solution. beyond that, the disagreement could facilitate us to further understand the problem. Sometimes, the disagreement itself is not valid. If we want to point out its faultiness or prove our own view, first of all we should give warrant reasons to support the opinion. However, sometimes we may understand problem superficially. Thus,through this process, we will inquiry the question deeply. like when i was in senior high school, my teachers always ask us explain questions to those who disagree with the standard answer. they want us not solely get a right answer but also absorb the question. admittedly, we could also study from people who agree with us. Yet we cannot make great progress. Since we cannot