The contention of the speaker asserts that the technologies determine the social customs and ethics instead of influence it. I disprove the speaker's contention. After all the determine elements is irreplaceable and directly cause the final result, however the technology is fail to equip with both conditions. From my point, I support the contention that the technology influences the social customs and ethics.
  Technologies exert a great influence on our life with the more and more new outcome produce. One apt illustration to this point involved in sweeping the grave through internet. Under the burgeoning of population in every tomb-sweeping day the traffic congestion caused a adverse affect to people's ordinary life. In order to avoid such situation people employ the internet as a mode in memory of death people. The content of the social custom still exist, whereas the form is changed. With the advance of the technology, the way people use to attain the information is increased and broad. On the other hand are the privacy information leaked out through the tool. Recently, Google street view is accused by people for privacy invasion. The software attempts to provide detailed information for people to be familiar with one place actual environment. However, the powerful function bring about many people's privacy exposure to the public which elicit the contradiction of society ethnics in the end.
  Technologies are not the determinant elements in people's social customs and ethics. People still master the domination of the direction of technology, even some of them may pose a potential threat. Despite the convenience bring by the internet. A large amount of people choose to observe the old convention in ceremony of the death people. In spite of the traffic jam, many people may try to avoid the peak time or figure out other solution to deal with the problem. They still are in favor of the traditional way which is the solid habit in people's deep consciousness. The cloning technology also informed us that social ethnics can hardly be determined by technology. We cannot deny the possibility that such technology can be used to clone a human being. But under the objection from the whole world such technology is fail to develop in a big progress. In some extent may originate from the exclamation of the public. Admittedly, we cannot stop the science step forward, irrespective of any time the technology cannot decide people's social customs and ethics.
  We as a human being should set a correct criterion to the technology. Especially delimit a line between human social customs, ethnics and the application range in our heart. Undeniably this line is very hard to draw in some cases. However every technology should enacts a role in promoting the society forward but not in the opposite. And those behavior deprecating the human social customs and ethnic is actually the regression to the whole society.
   In the final analyze, we should have a consciousness that technology own the two sides of its own. One may bring the better life to us, the other may be ruined our value system. However the crucial elements in this issue are depends on the people. Whether it turns to be the terminator for people's customs and ethnics, the rights of the determination is in the people's hand but not the technology itself can decide.