Should a nation require all of its students to learn the same course before sthdents have entered college?  The author's standpoint is that taking the same curriculum would guarentee every students could share the same resource of study, which could make sure they share the same quality of study and each of students wherever they came from a distenced village or a big city, if they are excellent they could be admitted by top college. Indeed, sharing the same curriculum could overshadow the different  study resources between one distanted village and a pompous city and more justable to students who born in a distenced village.  Nevertheless, a nation involved different kinds of culture, if all of its students taking the same curriculum which might result in these culture dispear. In additon, whether the national college entranec examination is undisinterested or not isn't result from whether every student taking the same curriculum but the policy of admission office of colleges.
There is no doubt that taking the same currilculum could  avoid the difference of education which was resulted from the economy.  As we all-known, the place which economy is developed have more abundon resource of education, and the students who bron in these place could easily enjoy the advantage technology, advantage method of education as well as the ample educational resources. In the contrast, in undeveloped place, students couldn't recept the sound knowledge for the government don't have enough money to import the neither advantage technology nor advantage approach of education nor ample resources.  It is obviously unfair to students who born in an undeveloped place.  For instance, if I want to receive the sound education of GRE, I have to go to capital, for its ample resources and experiential teachers, which could help me a lot.
Certainly, receviving the same corrilculum could make students share same quality of education, however, not all students should take same corrilculum for the following reasons.  Government shoud stand these students who have realize what his or her interest in, and support them with all kinds of resources; otherwise, not only it is a toilsome to students, but also a lost for nation, because nation might loss a master in some kinds of fields.  Moreover, some kind of ethnic minorities might not be inherited if governament force all of its students to take same kind of education. So, government should take different policies to different students belonged to different ethnics.
Inaddition, government should support its students to cultivate their interest, that is, government should spare more free time to its students, on the premise that students of a nation share the same kind of education, and encourage them do more research on their interests.  In this way, a nation could imporve educational level of the whole society, also might cultivate masters in all kinds of fields.  For example, had the United States force all of its tudents learned the same corriculum, Microsoft which was set up by Bill Gates who was addicted in computer since he was a little boy probably might not exist at all.
In a word, a nation should not force all of its students take the same corriculum before they entered college, or, in other words, a nation could operate tha same corriculum through out country when its students who haven't been admitted to colleges on the premise that government should support its students to develop their own interest without spare.  As for those students who haven't realize their interest, government could command them to take the same corriculum until they entranced university and encourage those students of ethnic minorities to learn their own special culture. Only in this way could a nation cultivated more excellent masters and specialists and prompt a nation develop.