With the exploited of the forests, the habitats of the wide animals are miniminized. Lossing the habitation makes the animlas have no place to live. This result partly because the human beings have been extending habitation which occuping the areas where the anials used to live. Nowadays, the speed of the extinction is accelerating, more and more species are leaving us without a sound. Although most of their extenction are result from the activities of human, it is too selfish to say that society should only save endangered sprcies.

Living right, generally, is the power given from the stronger one to the weaker one which is the principle of nature. Considering all the rights the animals have are those we proposed to give them. In this case, it is hard to say that animals have right themselve. People who want to take care of them, feed them, and prevent them from the extinction are due to the aspect of conscience. Getting the top of the world and controlling a lot of factors which are influenced a lot of living things, we also have the responsibility to help the weaker species. The higher level of the developed of the nation, the more concentration be taken on the prevent the animals. This reflects in the developed countries in which the people have taken more concentration in the prevention of animals. Because of this, with the develpement of the society, the human, whether have damadged the habitation of the animals or not, should have the conscience to save the exdangered animals.

On the other hand, we have been educated by animals all the time. Some of our techniques and inventions imitate the systems of the animals. The animals are the parts of the food chain which balance the ecology. And the ecological balance influence greatly on human. If we had lost a specie, it would minimize the gene deversity of the world. When gene pool is too poor to run, it would damage us in the end. From this aspect, preventing endangered animals seems to save us. There is no different between those who are endangered because of us and those who are not. Although the rule of the nature is that some species extiction while some species creation to a balance of sum, the speed of extiction are higher than the ceration these days. Even saving all the endandgered animals which are living today, we cannot create creatures to supplement the losted ones. Only to remedy the gene pool, we should do our best to save all endangered species without distinguishingly.

The governments almost spend 47thousands dollors per year to save endangered animals, which including the cost of purchasing the farmlands or regions for the habitation of the animals. It is a huge number; but it is worthwhile. Although we can spend this money to explore the outer spece, to study the science, to cure the medicial diseases, all of these cannot substitute the losing living creatures and add gene diversity to the gene pool. Even the we human are powerful enough, our intelligence cannot crate a single cresture by our techniques. When taking this into consideration, it is obvious that we should save the other creatures. Animals do not have right, but we should give them the chances to living rather than disappear.

In a nutshell, it is important for human to save endangered animals without distinguish which are caused by human activities. All creatures are equal. Standing on the top of the world, our resposibilty is to give the right for the animsla to live rather give them no opportunities to survival.