TOEFL 作文题目
来源于朗播用户：kathykira
In some countries, people are no longer allowed to smoke in many public places and office buildings. Do you think this is a good rule or a bad rule? Use specific reasons and details to support your position.
题目分析
翻译
在一些国家，现在不再允许人们在许多公共场所和办公楼吸烟。你认为这个规定是好还是不好？用具体理由和例子来支持你的观点。
指导
要注意题目讨论的其实就是应不应该禁止人们在公共场所吸烟，这与全面禁烟是不一样的。
写作思路 学会梳理作文思路--->上朗播网
1. 你自己吸烟吗？你或者你认识的朋友吸烟一般在什么地方？
回答：
不吸。
在卫生间，在户外。
2. 吸烟的危害有哪些？
回答：
影响自己的健康，家人的健康。
3. 吸烟除了对吸烟者本身有危害，对周边的人有影响吗？
回答：
有。
二手烟对人造成的健康危害更大。
很多人不喜欢香烟的味道。
4. 你觉得这个法规还有什么可以改进的地方？
回答：
应该设立单独的吸烟区。
因为马上让所有吸烟人戒烟是不现实的，要有一定的缓冲。
其他用户的回答
作文
As the develop of medicine, smoking becomes more and more related to many disease which threatened people's lives. In order to deal with this tough issue, many countries start out some solutions. One of them is to forbid smoking in public places and office buildings. In some distances, I would say this method is necessary.
First of all, places metioned above-public places, office buildings- are the ones that have numbers of people. If there is no resistence in smoking, many people would be effected. So to speak, the environment would became worse. Moreover, recent research turns out that second-handed somking harmed people more than first-handed.
In addition, this is a feasible method to help public reduce even stop smoking. As we all know, smoking could lead many kinds of disease. The far reaching study of the relation between lung cancer and smoking forced us to do something about this social issue. As many smokers who are chemically addicted to nicotine cannot cut down easily, the rule which set up by government could help them.
But, if this rule could be given some modification, the consequence would be better. In my opinion, some special somking eare should be set up at both public places and office buildings. The reason is same as last paragraph- they just not easy to quit smoking that quick.
All in all, this is a good way to supervise people not to smoke and lead a healthy life.
First of all, places metioned above-public places, office buildings- are the ones that have numbers of people. If there is no resistence in smoking, many people would be effected. So to speak, the environment would became worse. Moreover, recent research turns out that second-handed somking harmed people more than first-handed.
In addition, this is a feasible method to help public reduce even stop smoking. As we all know, smoking could lead many kinds of disease. The far reaching study of the relation between lung cancer and smoking forced us to do something about this social issue. As many smokers who are chemically addicted to nicotine cannot cut down easily, the rule which set up by government could help them.
But, if this rule could be given some modification, the consequence would be better. In my opinion, some special somking eare should be set up at both public places and office buildings. The reason is same as last paragraph- they just not easy to quit smoking that quick.
All in all, this is a good way to supervise people not to smoke and lead a healthy life.
举一反三如何书写地道作文--->上朗播网
1.
Some movies are serious, designed to make the audience think. Other movies are designed primarily to...
2.
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents are the best teachers. Use specific r...
3.
Nowadays, food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live? Use speci...
4.
It has been said, "Not everything that is learned is contained in books." Compare and contrast knowl...
5.
[Claim] Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience. [Reason] People who lack experience ar...