GRE 作文题目 来源于朗播用户:毛昞华
Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development. [Specific Task Instruction: Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.]
题目分析
翻译
政府应该对科学研究和发展尽量少地加以限制。[说明:写一篇文章,讨论你同意或反对这个建议达到什么程度,并解释你选择这个观点的理由。在展开和支持你的观点时,你要描述在具体的环境中,采纳这个建议可能会有什么好处,或不会有什么好处,并解释这些例子如何体现了你的观点]
指导
本题为老GRE的ISSUE69原题。题目讨论政府限制对科研的作用。给出的观点认为政府限制对科研存在负作用,应当尽可能得少。本题的分析可以从物质需求和非物质追求两个角度展开,同时还可以针对“few, if any”三个词进行论述。
1. 从政府角度,如何判断某件事的是有利还是有害的?哪些事情是政府关注的?
回答: 1.social benefits 2.potential damage 3.helpful for election governments and scientists have different stances about whether or not a research should be carried out--the contribution of the researches on the scientific development, is more likely to be taken into account by the scientists, rather than political or social impacts, which government values more.
2. 从科学研究的角度,其结果会对被政府关注的事物产生什么样的影响?(可以从医学、物理、化学、生物、天文、地理、人文等方面思考)
回答: social benefits:同类题目 potential damage:clone;nuclear--查资料 helpful for election
3. 如果政府对科学研究完全放开不管,给予最大支持,有求必应,会有什么结果?
回答: negative impacts examplified: clone;nuclear;weapon in WW2--查资料
4. 如果政府对科学研究进行严格限制,谨小慎微,又会有什么后果?
回答: positive impacts inhibited (1)those with unclear consequences--同类题目 (2)governmental officials are not expert in scientific scope, and they cannot estimate the scientific value of a research. (3)restrict science research for some political purposes. eg.medival times--查资料
5. 科学研究和发展需要一种怎样的平衡才能算做最健康的发展环境?
回答: encourage scientific research but with certain restraints.
其他用户的回答
写作指导
写作指导启发思路,积累素材,有效解决写作没思路、没素材的问题。
观看名师讲解,边看边学!
轻松扫一扫,有趣又有料
10G 托福视频教程分享群
374897650
10G GRE 视频教程分享群
305634398

请选择发起聊天的方式:

安装 QQ