写作指导 [Claim] In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years. [Reason] The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization thr描述一个曾经

GRE 作文题目来源于朗播用户：红黑剑鞘

[Claim] In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years. [Reason] The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. [Specific Task Instruction: Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.]

题目分析

翻译

[观点] 在任何领域——商业，政治，教育，政府——那些领导者在五年以后都应该下台。 [理由] 通过新的领导者来引发新的活力是让事业获得成功的最有效的方法。 [说明] 写一篇文章，讨论你同意或反对这个观点，以及支持观点的理由达到怎样的程度。

指导

本题改编自老GRE的ISSUE70"In any profession—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years. The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership"。题目的论述默认了一个前提，即在五年内，领导者会让所在的单位缺乏活力。因此，你以从几个方面来进行思考：一是造成事业缺乏生机和活力的原因有哪些，二是通过更换领导是否一定会给事业注入新的活力，三是有哪些方法会给事业带来新的变革和活力，四是更换领导者在哪些行业会带来新的活力。这个题目重点是论述领导者和一项事业是否具有活力之间的关系，不要纠结于类似“五年”这样的数据中，当然，也可以就“五年”是否会让一个单位失去活力，而更换领导是否可以解决来发表看法。

写作思路学会梳理作文思路--->上朗播网

1. 描述一个曾经很辉煌，而后来失去了活力的机构（企业，政府等），并分析它失去活力的原因。这些原因是否与领导者有关系？

回答：苏联。苏联在早期在列宁时代，斯大林前期的时候有着辉煌的成就，但是在之后的赫鲁晓夫，勃列日涅夫等时期，由于实行最高领导人终身制，导致思维僵化，全国上下死气沉沉，失去活力。与领导者本身有一定的关系，但是还与整个领导体制有极大的关系。

2. 导致事业失去活力的原因有哪些？哪些原因跟领导者有关系？有什么关系？请举例说明。

回答： 1.企业的结构不合理，员工上升空间小，工作积极性低。2.领导者水平不够，员工想取而代之而不能，失去工作兴趣。3.领导层决策失误，公司发展方向有误，员工看不到公司的出路。4，整个企业计划制定不合理，员工超负荷或终日无所事事，整个事业必然缺乏活力。

3. 更换新的领导会给事业发展带来什么好处和什么弊端？在一定时间内更换领导对哪些行业更有好处？请举例说明。

回答：好处：可以给企业带来新的面貌，可能增加企业内部的竞争力。弊端是新上任的领导要有一段时间的适应过程，对下属的不熟悉导致不能使每个人各尽所能。而且会中断原先的政策，造成管理混乱。对一些更新换代比较快的行业有好处，比如IT，设计

4. 对一个领导者的领导水平的评判应该考虑哪些因素？是否能因为企业失去了活力就让他/她下台？请举例说明。

回答：主要考虑领导者的管理能力和自身的业务水平。

5. 要让事业充满活力，可以有哪些手段和方法？请举例说明。

回答： 1.选择正确的发展方向，让所有人看到企业光明的未来。2.提高岗位的竞争性，打破铁饭碗制度。3.增强人才的流动性，多劳多得，少劳少得，不劳不得。4.鼓励创新

其他用户的回答

尚晶完成的同主题写作思路 wuyiwei 完成的同主题写作思路 britlovefan 完成的同主题写作思路 AprilMa 完成的同主题写作思路王蔚琪完成的同主题写作思路

作文

The author claims that to ensure the vigor in any enterprise in any field the leader should be replaced by a new one every five years.In my point of view,I am inclined to support the idea that the author points out .Nevertheless,I believe the feasibility of this proposal deserves careful consideration.One compelling argument in favor of such idea is that the new leader could bring innovative idea replacing the platitude.In business realm,when the new leader takes over a enterprise ,he could take advantages of unique thinking and ideas to inspire employees' creativity.Thus,new blood in the leadership is necessary to progress in a company.Steve Jobs is a prime example of such process.His return was so encouraging to the company that it rapidly developed innovative product which could not be designed before and came back to profitability.In politic

举一反三如何书写地道作文--->上朗播网

1. 【IBT机经-1】Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: In order to succeed, you should be m... 2. 【IBT机经-2】Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: If children want to do well in schoo... 3. 【IBT机经-3】Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Two people can still be good friends... 4. 【IBT机经-4】Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Colleges or Universities should offe... 5. 【IBT机经-1】Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: In order to succeed, you should be m...