I agree that when people question the authority, the well-being of society will be somewhat improved. The writer unnecessarily generalizes the importance of the feedback from people to the authority. The writer claims that questioning from citizen call always bring positive impact to society under every circumstance. However, the truth is that only if the questioning is appropriate and justified can the well-being of society be enhanced while inappropriate and hostile questioning may cause troubles disturbing social order. We can conclude that the government and the authority should be open to justified questioning and punish those ill-proposed feedback. When questioning from the public comes with positive motivation, the society will witness some benefits which help strengthen the well-being. Global modernization also brought most of the countries around the world democracy. The public are having more and more opportunities to offer their feedback and question the authority. Firstly, being part of the country's political life, people have the right to discuss some certain issue with the authority and present their praise as well as criticism. These feedback in turn enable the government to make some improvement. Secondly, with the intensification of the polarization between the poor and the rich, the acceptance of questioning from both the underclass and upper class can somewhat help promote social fairness. Besides, to accept people's supervision can prevent the society development from corruption, graft and abuse of power. For example, ex-chief security officer Zhou Yongkang has been detained for corruption just because of public tips-off. China's recent cracks down on abuse of power and graft are also result of the public's endeavor. People's questioning ends up impetus to an honest and upright society. Ignorance of public supervision which happened a lot in modern countries, especially in democratic administration, could result in massive political price. To fight against the government’s apathies, people always gather together to demonstrate or strike to show their pros and cons. The indifference to the public’s desire to express their idea on certain issue often lead to serious social problems which impact economic development or government officials’ resignations. Being open to criticism from the public does not mean acceptance without distinction. Those so called questioning with malicious intentions always turned out to be calumniation. The discussion on social issues are often bond with different interest group that may participate in with certain intentions. That is what the authority should pay more attention to. Unjustified questioning may disturb social order and threaten the prosperity of the country.To wrap up, the authority should make a clear distinction before make decision whether to take some questioning or criticism from the public. The relationship between people, authority and the well-being of society is a complicated one. Appropriate questioning from people can help the authority enhance the well-being of society, inappropriate questioning could produce negative impact to the healthy development of the country. The authority should welcome people, especially those from underclass, to express their opinion on social issue. As to ill-proposed criticism, the government should punish with no mercy to ensure the normal functioning of society.