GRE 作文题目 来源于朗播用户:huyishu
The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens. [Specific Task Instruction: Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.]
题目分析
翻译
一个国家领导人的效力可以通过调查该国公民的幸福程度来被最好地衡量。[说明:写一篇文章,讨论你同意或反对这个主张达到什么程度。在展开和支持你的观点时,一定要处理那些最有说服力的理由和/或例子,它们可能被用来挑战你的观点]
指导
本题讨论有效的国家领导与公民幸福程度之间的关系。题目有两个易混信息点:effectiveness和well-being of that country's citizens,两个正面的词用来形容同一个人,就像是现在的父母总是对孩子说:“你长大之后要出人头地,现在就要好好学习”。但是,是否一定要让人民幸福才算是领导有能力?由此即可展开对本题的思路,相对来说反对题目的写法是大家经常采用的。此题难点在于对“effectiveness”和“well-being of that country's citizens”的解释和衔接,以及对“best measured”的阐述上,在分析的时候需要注意。
1. 如何评价领导是否有效?在一位领导会涉及的各个方面,有效是以什么样的形式表现出来的?是否存在一个衡量的标准?请结合具体事例简述。
回答: 领导所负责而工作的成绩如何,如果涉及各个方面,那么领导有效该体现在它能够平衡各个方面,衡量的标准每个人都不同,比如一个国家的领导人,他的领导有效可能体现在国家的经济发展,人民生活水平,平衡与各国之间的关系,统一的衡量标准并不存在,即使本国居民对于经济的增长也有不同的评价
2. 哪些因素决定或影响了一国的公民是否幸福安康?请举例并简述。
回答: 公民的日常生活水平,受教育程度,社会福利制度的覆盖。比如欧洲许多国家学生上学学费减免。挪威的福利制度完善,人民的幸福感排名第一
3. 领导的效力由哪些因素共同决定?这些因素中哪些是最关键的?
回答: 领导的效力体现在他主导的政策的执行效果,而执行效果又与社会环境,具体操作人员的素质有关。其中政策的导向和社会环境很重要。比如大跃进的失败对比于改革的成功
4. 除了“公民幸福程度”以外,还有哪些其他内容可以体现或衡量一个国家领导人的效力?请分析并简述。
回答: 国家的影响力,去其他国家的交流与合作。比如朝鲜的领导是公认的失败,人民生活困苦不说,他本身经常招来国际舆论的谴责,封闭的政策使得对外交流基本为0
5. 问题四中其他的衡量标准和公民幸福程度相比,在衡量国家领导人的效力的过程中,哪个更好?为什么?
回答: 国家的影响力比较重要,因为人民的生活水平是一个长期的过程,可能短短的执政时间并不能完成明显的改善,比如自1978到80年代后期的胡耀邦赵紫阳等人执政时期,中国内陆地区的人民生活水平并没有明显的改善,反而是进入九十年代,资本得到一定积累的时候,人们的日常生活变化才显现出来,国家的影响力包括了军事经济,文化,政策的显现周期较短,这更能对体现执政者的能力。
其他用户的回答
作文
After three decades fast economic development, Chinese scholars have raised a new question: Who contributed most to the transformation policy, Deng Xiaoping, or the following Jiang Zemin or the present president Hu Jintao? There is no wonder that every ruler hopes to be remembered as the motivators of this great policy which changed Chinese people's life in every aspects. I believe, it is time to give up such meaningless arguement since citizen's wealth should not be taken as a judgemnt to a political leader' ability.

When referring to history decuments, one notices that it is not hard to find out that many of the great leaders in history were not famous for their domestic policies, instead, for battles. If taking about the Chinese history from the ancient time to the former Qing empire, scholars  will conclude this long period with brief words, wars and invasion. Every famous emperor, whether Liu Che,or Li Shimin or Zhu Yuanzhang, was featured as using voilence to get their political power. Contrast to present terr organizaiton, people thouth them as wise as the Great Alexendar since the new political power they brought was dedicated to save people from hard and poor life. Consider the Chinese civilian war in the 1940's. The famous Chinese leader, Chairman Mao, as many Chinese people called him, was charcteristiced by his outstanding comandership. The examples above tells a truth to some degree that under wars or disordered society, the effcts of a leader'a ability  concentrate on overide the old and unreasonable order rather than people's well being.

Even in peaceful time, besides the peopel's well being, the national influence is an indispensible fact when measuring a national leader's ability. Last month, the North Korea failed to send their satellite. International concern concentrated on this contry again. Few people claim that the political regime in North Korea is rational and advanced. Politic pefessors argue that the dictator family should be responcible to the the closed society.When political consultants mentiong this country, they harshly critisized its former leader, Kin Jong II ,and his father or his son in the future. Similarly to the Korean leader, Russian president is also not welcomed by international politicians. Although Russia does not export starvation, the domestic disagreements among the diverse races still cause troubles to the government. People are more concern about the voilence activity anymore than the productivity in Russian fatories. The examples of the two contries indicate that a political leader deals with not only the food reduction or job rate but also the relationship with allains and the interantional impression of his country.

Honestly, people's  life is a basic social issue since people is the main building block of a society or a nation. Only when citizen's material requirement is satisfied, can they ve willing to think about other mental issues. Economic policies, however, fails to reflect the makers' political claim since it require long time to achieve. Therefore, when testing a leader's ability, policies in other aspect,as culture,military or foreign affair are more reliable than the that related to  economy. 
写作指导
写作指导启发思路,积累素材,有效解决写作没思路、没素材的问题。
观看名师讲解,边看边学!
轻松扫一扫,有趣又有料
10G 托福视频教程分享群
374897650
10G GRE 视频教程分享群
305634398

请选择发起聊天的方式:

安装 QQ