GRE 作文题目
来源于朗播用户：周新权
Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. [Specific Task Instruction: Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.]
题目分析
翻译
教育机构应该阻止它们的学生选择那些不太可能会成功的领域去学习。[说明：写一篇文章，讨论你对于这个政策的观点，并解释你选择这个观点的理由。在展开和支持你的观点时，你需要考虑这个政策生效以后可能带来的结果，并解释这些结果如何支持了你的观点]
指导
本题讨论选择专业的参考因素。可以考虑教育应当如何培养学生的问题，除了以后的工作以外，教育应当提供给学生什么样的价值观和理念。而且对于“成功”的定义也是需要仔细考虑的内容。在分析的过程中，可以从教育培养学生是为了满足哪些要求、价值观对学生的作用、为成功而选择专业的意义、二者之间的关系以及利弊的对比等方面展开思考。
写作思路 学会梳理作文思路--->上朗播网
1. 怎样评价学习某个专业是否可能成功或者不可能成功？应该参考哪些因素？请举例并简述。
回答：
经济标准：能挣多少钱 学术标准：取得什么成果 社会标准：为社会做出多少贡献 自我标准：自我实现与是否有兴趣
2. 如果没能形成正确的价值理念标准，而仅仅为了“成功”而选择专业，会有哪些潜在的问题和不足？请举例并简述。
回答：
很难取得真正的成功，就算成功也只是部分的，不会实现自我实现，反而得不尝试，就算成功了，如果没有好的道德规范也将危害社会
3. 除了为以后的成功做准备以外，在大学阶段，学生应该锻炼哪些其他能力？怎样进行这些能力的锻炼？请举例并简述。
回答：
自学能力，沟通交流能力，抗挫折能力； 参加社会实践，养成自学的习惯，不畏困难，挑战自己
4. 在毕业之后的工作和生活中，是否只有专业知识才是有用的？如果不是，还有哪些知识是有用的？为什么？请举例说明。
回答：
不是，首先未必从事所学专业的工作，比如学的是电子工程，做的是行政管理；就算是做相关领域的工作，但是知识更新的速度太快，原来学的知识可能已经过时，这时自学能力尤为重要； 而且在社会和生活中沟通能力和抗挫折能力也必不可少
5. 教育机构应该对学生的学习和发展起到怎样的引导作用？都应该如何去做？请分析并简述。
回答：
教育机构做的更多的其实应该是给学生提供一个公平丰富精彩的平台，学生可以学习，锻炼，自我选择，展现自我。。。
其他用户的回答
作文
As an increasing need for specialists, some people propose that educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. At the first glance it may seem plausible, after a critical thinking and comprehensive analysis, however, I cannot agree with the unreasonable suggestion.
Firstly, the standard for judging the fields of study in which the students will suceed or not is too vague to have a clear discrimination which fields should be dissuaded for a particular students. Einstein, one of the most brilliant and intelligent scientists in the world. was considered to be stupid at the young age turning out that the judge is incorrect and groundless. Besides the success itself is vague conception. Given that a student may be unlikely to be sucessful in studying a subject to make much money, but can we make sure he will not make academic achievements by doing so? Moreover, it is impossible to predict what effect does his effort have on the society, perhaps his little idea may change the world. Even if he cannot succeed in the above perspectives, what if he does really love the field? All educational institutions should do is to encourage instead of dissuading. Therefore, it is extremely difficult to decide whether the students will be succussful in a paritcular field.
Furthermore, the graduate may have a job without relating the major they studied in schools so that the fields of study matters little to the future career of students. According to the statistical result of a recent survey aiming at Chinese college graduates, nearly 50 percent of the students choose to work without involving in their major study. And the responds says what they learn from colleges and universities is the learning ability so that they are confident to handle the new position. As the knowledge and technology renewing so fast, most sklls need in the job are studied within work. Meanwhile, the society where competition is ubiquitous requires us to have many qualities and capabilities, thus we should not give up the fields which seem unpromissing.
As I mention above, in order to ensure students to survive in the society educational institutions are responsible to cultivate students' ability such as self-study ability, communicating skills, creative spirits and the ability to resist difficulties and disappointments. Whereupon various social acitivities in which people can communicate and cooperate with each other should be available to students. What's more, schools should assist students to develop the habit of self learning and encourage them to challenge themselves bravely other than being afraid of difficulties and frustrations.
From the analysis made above, I insist it is presumptuous to claim that educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed in respect that it is not only benifical for individual develpment but harmful for social benifits.
Firstly, the standard for judging the fields of study in which the students will suceed or not is too vague to have a clear discrimination which fields should be dissuaded for a particular students. Einstein, one of the most brilliant and intelligent scientists in the world. was considered to be stupid at the young age turning out that the judge is incorrect and groundless. Besides the success itself is vague conception. Given that a student may be unlikely to be sucessful in studying a subject to make much money, but can we make sure he will not make academic achievements by doing so? Moreover, it is impossible to predict what effect does his effort have on the society, perhaps his little idea may change the world. Even if he cannot succeed in the above perspectives, what if he does really love the field? All educational institutions should do is to encourage instead of dissuading. Therefore, it is extremely difficult to decide whether the students will be succussful in a paritcular field.
Furthermore, the graduate may have a job without relating the major they studied in schools so that the fields of study matters little to the future career of students. According to the statistical result of a recent survey aiming at Chinese college graduates, nearly 50 percent of the students choose to work without involving in their major study. And the responds says what they learn from colleges and universities is the learning ability so that they are confident to handle the new position. As the knowledge and technology renewing so fast, most sklls need in the job are studied within work. Meanwhile, the society where competition is ubiquitous requires us to have many qualities and capabilities, thus we should not give up the fields which seem unpromissing.
As I mention above, in order to ensure students to survive in the society educational institutions are responsible to cultivate students' ability such as self-study ability, communicating skills, creative spirits and the ability to resist difficulties and disappointments. Whereupon various social acitivities in which people can communicate and cooperate with each other should be available to students. What's more, schools should assist students to develop the habit of self learning and encourage them to challenge themselves bravely other than being afraid of difficulties and frustrations.
From the analysis made above, I insist it is presumptuous to claim that educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed in respect that it is not only benifical for individual develpment but harmful for social benifits.
举一反三如何书写地道作文--->上朗播网
1.
【IBT机经-1】Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: In order to succeed, you should be m...
2.
The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. [Specific Task Instruc...
3.
Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study in which...
4.
Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field o...
5.
As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for the...